• xep
    link
    fedilink
    -39
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s almost as if cheaters ruin hyper competitive games like Valorant. How dare they try to keep the game free from cheaters. The nerve!

    • NekuSoul
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      I’d have a bit more symphaty if they at least tried to do the bare minimum before choosing the nuclear option.

      Most notably, the PVE queues in LoL were infested with bots for years and you could tell them apart from real players before they even made their first move. Often times you’d be the only human player. If stuff like that wasn’t caught, I have serious doubts about their previous efforts to catch “real” cheaters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Also there could (and should?) be “simply” two launch options. One with “hardcore anti cheat” and one with some much simpler anti-cheat. Then a lobby option what you want to allow. You want to play competitive/league/whatever? Then require the hardcore anti-cheat. Otherwise: why bother.

        • NekuSoul
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Yup. At the very least, they shouldn’t have made it a requirement for TFT. If it were possible to cheat there that’d be more of a game design problem anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As someone who rehosts an old game after the official servers shutdown, we have a dedicated servers for cheating and real moderators for the non-cheat ones. It works great but big corps don’t way to pay for mods.

      I also wonder why big companies don’t do it to train ML algorithms on the cheat server data too…

        • Sonotsugipaa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Agreed. For detecting cheaters, statistics work like a Dream

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Only if you want to cap the skill limit. Otherwise you would typically have a hand full of players that are genuinely just good or rather far outside the normal skill range. I guess with a lot of data collection one might be able to determine if there was some kind of natual progress or sudden skill jumps, but all in all it could weed out legitimate players.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            You can detect the hit ratio for shooters and win rates for games with matchmaking, those are really good indicators for cheating.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Honestly I’d rather have a cheater in my lobby than Riot Games deep into the sections of my PC they should never have accessed.

      With that said, I do not play Valorant for this reason (and also because it would require me to dualboot since Vanguard cannot be ported on Linux, lol)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      I’d be somewhat ok with Kernel anticheat if they would work, but the simple truth is that they do nothing of value. COD has Kernel anticheat with Riccochet and is flooded with cheaters. Valorant has only slightly less cause riot updates Vanguard more often.

      But guess what, it usually takes 1-2 days for new cheats to reach the relevant forums, maybe a few days more until they are more widely aviable. At most cheaters have to spend another 5€ every 6 months, but that’s it. They don’t care, the amount of money spent on accounts every other month is already way higher.

      The only two things anticheat like vanguard protects you from is script kiddies that google “valorant cheat .exe” and Linux only players. And the former could just as well be filtered out without Kernel level.