• @Fal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -19 months ago

    It’s not ignored. It’s a justification for the other half, not a requirement

      • @Fal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -39 months ago

        If you can argue that it’s never a concern that the government will illegally exceed its constitutional authority and threaten the country’s status as a free state, maybe. Good luck with that.

          • @Fal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -29 months ago

            Ensuring a free state is the why, citizens owning guns is how

              • @Fal
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                If you want MAGAs in government and law enforcement to be the only ones with guns then that’s your decision. The 2nd amendment makes sure everyone else doesn’t have to do that.

                • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  29 months ago

                  ‘American gun culture prevents American fascism’ is not what happened so far. They have a relationship. That’s not it.

                  And again: the amendment justifies guns guns guns with a militia that no longer exists. It’s one sentence that does not say what you want.

                  • @Fal
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -19 months ago

                    with a militia that no longer exists.

                    So you’re wrong here. But even if you weren’t, nowhere in the amendment does it say belonging to a militia is a requirement

                    ‘American gun culture prevents American fascism’ is not what happened so far. They have a relationship. That’s not it.

                    So passing gun control because the black panthers were arming themselves for protection against fascists is a success story for you?