• NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      -98 months ago

      The difference between what Tara claims and what E. Carroll claims is one went to court, the other tried to make it a national spectacle in an election year, and fled to Russia when that failed

      She took to court forty years later when a democrat paid for the lawyer. She doesn’t know when it happened. Not the year, month, or anything but still posted with trump later in photos. I wouldn’t do that with my rapist.

      Tara fled due to threats to her life. Even her husband confirmed the details in a court record in 1995. So this isn’t some issue that magically popped up. You’re just living in denial.

      I am ok with Trump because i don’t believe her. She’s a liar or an idiot, I don’t trust either.

      If it’s overturned in appeals, will you still be ranting the same?

      I suspect you’re still mad that rittenhouse got away.

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -98 months ago

          Nobody found him guilty of rape. The jury found him liable for sexual assault but specifically not for rape.

          I see it as nothing more than a political attack. Otherwise, where are the criminal charges?

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -98 months ago

              least with E. Carrolls claim Trump was proven to have actually done it

              Actually incorrect. That would be beyond a reasonable doubt. The Burden for civil court is the preponderance of evidence.

              If trump was convicted of the crime if rape. I wouldn’t vote for him but that hasn’t happened. Odd she didn’t want to press criminal charges. You’d think she’d want him in prison for raping her even though she doesn’t know when it happened and still posed with him afterwards. That’s clown world in a nutshell