• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -144 months ago

    There is a lot of good arguments in that book.

    A system where you have to do something positive for your country to vote isn’t the worst idea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      204 months ago

      … And who, exactly, gets to decide what is something “positive” enough to warrant having your voice represented? Fucking yikes my dude.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Citizens vote on it I imagine.

        It was a very democratic society all you had to do was serve.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          Right, so if I don’t serve I don’t get to vote. That’s fucking wild. Let’s look at Israel for how great compulsory service is and a beacon of democracy then shall we

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -14 months ago

            Israel is way more militaristic than the society in Starship Troopers. That isn’t a fair comparison.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Who gets to vote is decided by a vote? How did they get their right to vote? That’s a great incentive for current voters to prevent anyone who doesn’t agree with them from getting voting rights in the future.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              64 months ago

              Yeah sure, until civil war breaks out decades later over the huge portion of the population that couldn’t vote because it was democratically decided that they were the wrong skin color. It’s not like this is some untested idea.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -24 months ago

                Okay you’re right. An elite few should hold the power on who gets to vote and who doesn’t.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  What is the original voting block hoarding their voting rights (eg white male land owners) if not an elite few?

                  Look, obviously infants can’t vote, so you have a point that technically there needs to be a democratic way to decide who can and can’t vote based on maturity/age at least, but there’s no good argument for any further restrictions on adult residents subject to the law of their government. I don’t care if they’re not in military service, I don’t care if they’re bums on the street, I don’t care if they’re slaves, I don’t care if they’re serving life in prison - they’re citizens, they’re subject to the system, they deserve equal say in how the system works. Excessively legislating who can and can’t vote is just asking for “an elite few” to exploit it.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -44 months ago

                    You could argue that people exploit the system when someone leaches off it when others do hard work.

                    At least it someone had to serve the betterment of their country for a while they aren’t just leaching.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        What if I were to tell you, in the book, you could do it by being a social worker, a teacher, or any form of civil service?