• PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Whether a Western-backed dictator would be better or worse is hard to say. All dictators are, of course, terrible, but it’s difficult to discern just how terrible each one is before they come to power. In any case, we can and should demand better of our governments than that. We may be deeply flawed democracies, but we are still democracies, and must stand in support of our ideals, not dictators, no matter how West-friendly. Fuck, at least some of the time.

    • @VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      From history, the dictators are never better than the alternative. USA owned West Germany hiring ex-Nazi elites to run the gov, Pinochet refining torture methods for the CIA, all of South Korea’s dictators post-Korean War

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        I meant some dictators are better than others, not that some dictators are better than less autocratic forms of government.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yeah, sure. Go ahead. Compare American-backed dictators and non-American-backed dictators.

        Not a lot of difference.

        • @orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          there actually is, the amount of civilians killed, because unlike the soviets, the Americans kept a leash of theirs.

          like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            the Americans kept a leash of theirs.

            Not really.

            like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot

            Pol Pot was supported by China, not the Sovs. What’s more, Pol Pot was hardly an ‘average’ outcome.