@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 1 year agoB-but both sideslemmy.worldimagemessage-square265arrow-up1924arrow-down198
arrow-up1826arrow-down1imageB-but both sideslemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square265
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agothere actually is, the amount of civilians killed, because unlike the soviets, the Americans kept a leash of theirs. like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot
minus-squarePugJesuslinkfedilink2•1 year ago the Americans kept a leash of theirs. Not really. like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot Pol Pot was supported by China, not the Sovs. What’s more, Pol Pot was hardly an ‘average’ outcome.
there actually is, the amount of civilians killed, because unlike the soviets, the Americans kept a leash of theirs.
like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot
Not really.
Pol Pot was supported by China, not the Sovs. What’s more, Pol Pot was hardly an ‘average’ outcome.