I just can’t, and sadly it’s worst in Linux community. Like dude’s face hair makes him look 45, but no, he does a desktop with a cringy looking 15 old anime girl. (That, on top of hiz annoyingly high pitched voice but whatever) I just stop watching the video on the spot, it’s beyond dumb.

The stupid NSFW tag on Lemmy? I turned it ON to occasionally see boobs, not some drawn pictures of underage kiddo, this pisses me off so much, JUST FCKING STAHP with this shit.

I have an impression suddenly, in a span of 2 years everyone started to jerk off on that bullshit and are proud to show it

  • RaivoKulli
    6•1 year ago

    The whole thing of those characters is that they look like kids. That’s the whole thing. And if you’re looking out material specifically for that reason, then guess what that makes you

    It’s not exactly rocket surgery.

    If we’re talking about photorealistic depictions of kids, sure, that might mean you’re a pedophile

    MIGHT

    ???

    • @Fal
      -1•1 year ago

      Most likely. I could entertain reasons for looking at that without being attracted to it. But either way, it’s a drawing. I’m 100% fine with pedophiles looking at computer generated photorealistic images like that. Why would you be against that? Would you rather them look at two kids?

      • RaivoKulli
        2•1 year ago

        I was just explaining to you why those people are labeled as pedophiles.

        • @Fal
          0•1 year ago

          Ok but a lot of people are in labeled as pedos even in this thread when it doesn’t apply. Pedophilia is being attracted to kids in real life. Or fantasizing about real kids. Applying that to things that aren’t human and don’t even exist is just abusing the term and making it meaningless

          • RaivoKulli
            3•1 year ago

            I don’t know how you don’t get it. If you are sexually into those charcters because they’ve been specifically drawn as kids, then you’re a pedo. You’re claiming that you can’t be gay for watching drawn gay porn since it’s drawn. Think about that shit for a moment.

            • @Fal
              1•1 year ago

              I’m absolutely not saying you can’t be a pedophile for looking at lolis. It just doesn’t automatically make you one. The same way looking at gay hentai/furry doesn’t make you gay. People can have fantasies about things that they are 100% not into or attracted to in real life.

              • RaivoKulli
                1•1 year ago

                And what’s the specific feature that makes “lolis” “lolis”?

                • @Fal
                  1•1 year ago

                  The fact that the creator publishes their age. What else?