I just can’t, and sadly it’s worst in Linux community. Like dude’s face hair makes him look 45, but no, he does a desktop with a cringy looking 15 old anime girl. (That, on top of hiz annoyingly high pitched voice but whatever) I just stop watching the video on the spot, it’s beyond dumb.

The stupid NSFW tag on Lemmy? I turned it ON to occasionally see boobs, not some drawn pictures of underage kiddo, this pisses me off so much, JUST FCKING STAHP with this shit.

I have an impression suddenly, in a span of 2 years everyone started to jerk off on that bullshit and are proud to show it

  • RaivoKulli
    3•1 year ago

    I don’t know how you don’t get it. If you are sexually into those charcters because they’ve been specifically drawn as kids, then you’re a pedo. You’re claiming that you can’t be gay for watching drawn gay porn since it’s drawn. Think about that shit for a moment.

    • @Fal
      1•1 year ago

      I’m absolutely not saying you can’t be a pedophile for looking at lolis. It just doesn’t automatically make you one. The same way looking at gay hentai/furry doesn’t make you gay. People can have fantasies about things that they are 100% not into or attracted to in real life.

      • RaivoKulli
        1•1 year ago

        And what’s the specific feature that makes “lolis” “lolis”?

        • @Fal
          1•1 year ago

          The fact that the creator publishes their age. What else?

            • @Fal
              1•1 year ago

              They don’t have an age, they’re a drawing

              • RaivoKulli
                1•1 year ago

                You just told me this

                The fact that the creator publishes their age.

                I’m asking what’s the age

                • @Fal
                  1•1 year ago

                  The point is it doesn’t matter. If the creator says they’re 12 or 16 or 29 or 3000. If that’s what you’re basing it on (and, that’s the only thing you really could be basing it on) then, if you can’t see how absurd it is to base whether or not something is moral/legal/ethical purely on a number the creator arbitrarily assigns to their creation, I’m not sure what to tell you. But I can tell you you’re certainly not protecting kids, or anything actually useful.

                  • RaivoKulli
                    2•1 year ago

                    I mean we both know they’re drawn to look like kids too but I don’t think you’re going to admit that anytime soon tbh. But even just specifically looking for characters where the author says they’re 12 for kicks is obviously that gets one labeled as a pedo.