• @Shrike502@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22 years ago

    Okay, I’ll bite. What, in your personal opinion, is the reason for Russian military do blow up the dam? What is the benefit?

    • @vegai@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago
      1. To slow down Ukraine crossing Dnepr and attacking Crimea.

      2. General scorched earth strategy

      • @FaceDeer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        And I could easily flip the question around to OP. Why would Ukraine blow up their own dam, flooding their own territory and potentially crippling their own nuclear power plant? And making a counteroffensive across the Dnipro river that much harder?

        It’s not to deprive Crimea of water ahead of the counteroffensive, Crimea’s reservoirs are full right now so they’ve got a year’s worth in the tank. That’s about the only possible benefit I can think of that Ukraine might have got out of this, and even if it were so it would be a trivial benefit compared to the costs. Crimea’s water supply isn’t going to make a difference to the actual fight that’s about to happen there.

    • @AngryAvocado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      One thing would be that Russia has already set a precedent with a long campaign to attack and destroy civilian infrastructure (power and heat specifically) just before winter to cause bigger humanitarian crisis.

        • Krause [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Fired a what at whom?

          https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-g-20-summit-nato-biden-government-and-politics-c76bead57a11bc8397a30ee7bb06264e

          Poland, NATO say missile strike wasn’t a Russian attack

          PRZEWODOW, Poland (AP) — NATO member Poland and the head of the military alliance both said Wednesday that a missile strike in Polish farmland that killed two people appeared to be unintentional and was probably launched by air defenses in neighboring Ukraine.

          “Ukraine’s defense was launching their missiles in various directions, and it is highly probable that one of these missiles unfortunately fell on Polish territory,” said Polish President Andrzej Duda. “There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to suggest that it was an intentional attack on Poland.”

          Edit: downvoted for correcting misinfo quoting NATO and the Polish government, that’s pretty funny :P

          • @lntl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            I mentioned Polen middle thing as similar to Nord steam thing: No Russian involvement

            • Krause [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I see, I read it as a serious claim of them doing it since it was a pretty common talking point a few months ago, sorry hehe :P

          • @PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 years ago

            Polish President Andrzej Duda. “There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to suggest that it was an intentional attack on Poland.”

            The well known Kremlin propagandist… Andrzej Duda XD

      • Untitled9999
        link
        fedilink
        -12 years ago

        There are only 2 types of people who deny that Russia blew up the pipeline:

        1. People who have a vested interest in supporting Russia’s imperialism and denying their crimes
        2. Idiots