So I bought 2 sets because it looked like one set was briefly lost in the mail and this past week I got an email from Amazon that said one set I bought were “fakes.”

  • Both sets have printing that matches legitimate manufactures.
  • The “legitimate” set have all black filters (not the metalized filters I am used to like Thousand Oaks Optical) the “fakes” have the metalized filters.
  • Both sets of glasses have the same transmittance as the Thousand Oaks filter material I use on my telescope and cameras.
  • The build quality of the “legitimate” glasses is quite a bit worse than the “fakes” with the two layers of paper being misaligned

So, what I suspect is that I actually received a crappy set of “real” glasses and a well made set of counterfeits, this seems in line with the press release made by the American Astronomical Scociety.[0]

Some of these newly identified counterfeits are indistinguishable from genuine Qiwei products and appear to be safe. Others look like Qiwei’s eclipse glasses, but when you put them on, you realize they are no darker than ordinary sunglasses. So, these products are not just counterfeit, but also fake –– they’re sold as eclipse glasses, but they are not safe for solar viewing.

So, did anyone get unlucky enough to get some ‘real-fake’ glasses? An did anyone get a set of legitimate glasses with the non-metalized filter?

[0] https://aas.org/press/american-astronomical-society-warns-counterfeit-fake-eclipse-glasses

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 months ago

    I buy a lot of my telescope equipment from Celestron so I got their kit. It was like $2 more than the knockoff brands but I like my eyeballs so went with a company I trust with relatively inexpensive optics.

    • Nik282000OP
      link
      fedilink
      207 months ago

      You can use a pinhole to project an image of the sun onto a sheet of paper but not directly as glasses. Look up a ‘pinhole projector’ you can make a pretty good one with an Amazon box.

    • Karyoplasma
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In case this is not sarcasm: Do not use selfmade glasses to observe the eclipse. It will temporarily or even permanently blind you.

      Edit: I misunderstood. Pinhole projectors are safe. Just make sure you don’t accidentally look directly into the sun.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I can’t see it anyway from my part of the world :( I was just curious because it doesn’t seem like it would be safe, but it was literally taught to me in elementary school.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57 months ago

    I am near the totality line, but stressing over this problem resulted in me giving up planning to see it.

    Seeing the eclipse directly would be cool, sure, but it will certainly be photographed extensively. I feel like permanently damaging my vision is way too likely buying something off of Amazon, and I don’t have a clue where else I can find them.

    • ArtieShaw
      link
      fedilink
      127 months ago

      If you can get to an area where it will be in totality, you can see it without eye protection during that brief 2-3 minute window. The danger to your eyes is when it’s at anything less than full total eclipse.

      Workaround: You can see the eclipse with a low tech solution of a pinhole camera. Google it for a better explanation, but

      -poke a pin through a sheet of paper. -during the eclipse, just hold it over something like another sheet of paper and you can see an accurate projection of the sun as the eclipse progresses

      It’s actually pretty neat.

      But if your weather is good, consider going to a place where the eclipse will be total. I’m in the path, but I’m seriously considering driving several hours to a place with a better weather forecast. I’ve seen good quality photo and video of total eclipses since I was a child. And the people who showed it to me (astronomy nerds from a club) told me “it’s not the same.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Thank you, yes…I’ll probably do the pinhole camera I suppose. I won’t be quite in totality, so definitely don’t want to risk it without protection. But I might try Lowes, from BeardedBlaze’s recommendation, since I assume there’s accountability in their distribution chain.

        • ArtieShaw
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Celestron is a name I know and would trust. My dad had one of their telescopes and it was pretty nice. That was in the '80s though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I’m driving about 15 hours (over 2 days, not all at once, lol) from Virginia to the totality path with a “just ok” forecast. I made a similar trip in 2017. It is definitely not the same as looking at a picture. It’s the changes in atmosphere, the insects’ behavior, the light quality all around you that make a totality viewing special. If you can make it somewhere with decent enough skies, you will be glad you did.

        • OsaErisXero
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          I got mine at home depot, there was a tub of them between the checkout and power tools. Like 2 bucks per.

        • BeardedBlaze
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          There was a tub of them middle of the walkway, close to the check out registers

  • Gamma
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    Pretty much every gas station I’ve been to the past week had a box of glasses