• @Cosmos7349@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1098 months ago

    I mean it’s a play as old as time; “we give great deals to the sellers and the buyers, until we own the market”

      • @pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        578 months ago

        Developers. UE5 is chalking up to be the defacto standard for modern titles that don’t have budgets large enough to make their own engine.

        EGS, on the other hand, is still an abysmal failure beyond the lure of free (and increasingly shittier) games and a yearly 25% off discount coupon that people fall for.

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          348 months ago

          I really wish they’d start by not making the EGS program a fucking UE5 app. Seriously, using the whole ass engine to render html is stupid beyond belief

              • I Cast Fist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                If you peruse the folder where it’s installed and compared to any UE4 or UE5 game, you’ll notice all the other similarities in .dll files, folders and whatnot. Even the CrashReporter.exe is the same you see in unreal games. Or you can check the config files at Epic Games\Launcher\Engine\Config which has stuff like BaseEngine.ini which, among other networking configurations, also has this:

                [/Script/Engine.Engine]
                ConsoleClassName=/Script/Engine.Console
                GameViewportClientClassName=/Script/Engine.GameViewportClient
                LocalPlayerClassName=/Script/Engine.LocalPlayer
                WorldSettingsClassName=/Script/Engine.WorldSettings
                NavigationSystemClassName=/Script/NavigationSystem.NavigationSystemV1
                NavigationSystemConfigClassName=/Script/NavigationSystem.NavigationSystemModuleConfig
                AvoidanceManagerClassName=/Script/Engine.AvoidanceManager
                PhysicsCollisionHandlerClassName=/Script/Engine.PhysicsCollisionHandler
                

                Meanwhile, in Epic Games\Launcher\Portal\Config, the “game” part of the launcher, you have DefaultGame.ini and DefaultEngine.ini, the latter’s first 2 lines pointing back to the Engine folder: [Configuration] BasedOn=..\Engine\Config\BaseEngine.ini

                So, yeah, it’s the actual engine. I was going to complain about disk bloat, but my Steam install is currently sitting at 1.3GB and I’m not entirely sure how much of that is from cached stuff. GOG Galaxy is taking ~980MB, but roughly 650MB are from redist installers (MSVC2005, 2007, dotnet, etc), so a “clean” install would be way lighter than Steam or EGS, the latter at 1.1GB on a clean install.

            • I Cast Fist
              link
              fedilink
              English
              98 months ago

              Ever heard the saying “Everything looks like a nail when you have a hammer”? Basically, just because you have a tool, it doesn’t mean it’s the best tool for every job. UE5 is great for making games, cinematics and loads of other stuff. But why use it to effectively behave as a browser like Chrome or Firefox, but worse, when there are alternatives made specifically for that?

              • @steakmeoutt@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -68 months ago

                That’s not really a valid response. Please accurately clarify why UE5 is inefficient at running a store. Benchmarks and other evidence is required.

                • @pivot_root@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  5
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t think benchmarks are really needed to explain this. The whole game engine part is an unnecessary step.

                  To initialize a web browser component within UE5, you first need to initialize UE5 and then the web browser within it. Or, you could initialize a web browser directly, saving the memory and time needed to start up UE5.

                  They clearly have developers who know how to use CEF or whatever web view framework since they added it to Unreal Engine, so it’s not like they don’t know how to add it to a standalone application.

        • @Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Nope. Godot, a fully free Unity-like Engine is shaping up to be the defacto standard for good games (AAA garbage is being ignored purposefully)

          • @pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 months ago

            I know Godot exists, and it’s preferable to supporting Epic, but it isn’t up to feature parity with UE5. Particularly, when it comes to asset streaming and open world games, Unreal has better support out of the box.

            I would love for Godot to be the standard and first choice for every developer (including AAA), though.

          • @UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            “ignoring the major players in the industry”

            UE5 had turned into the standard whether you like it or not. I personally don’t like the engine, but that doesn’t mean I’ll lie about its position in the market, and neither should you. You aren’t doing Godot any favours with it

            • @Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              When said “major players” only pump out trash that’s not fun to play, yes, I will ignore them gladly. The last AAA game I bought was Fallen Order, which I promply refunded after finishing, since it was more of a walking and climbing simulator than anything else – and that was one of the better AAA games to come out in the past decade.

              Indie devs and studios are the ones actually carrying the industry forwards.

              • @UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Your preference doesn’t dictate what’s industry standard is my point. It would be like someone only playing exclusively Total War games claiming the Warscape Engine is industry standard, sounds pretty stupid doesn’t it.

                The last AAA game I bought was Fallen Order,

                A shame you missed out on Baldurs Gate 3 then. Alan Wake also got great criticism.

                • @Gabu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  08 months ago

                  Fallacious reasoning. “Indie” isn’t a genre of games. I don’t claim AAA games are garbage because of a preference – they’re objectively slop made without passion as a cashgrab.

      • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Rocket League and Fall Guys are also on there. Not sure how much paid games sell there though.

      • @Rose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Steam is largely driven by Valve’s own games and freebies as well. 1.5M currently playing Dota 2 and CS 2, with the next best being F2P games: PUBG with 370K online, Apex Legends, and Naraka.

    • DdCno1
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They are anti-consumer, but for smaller devs in particular, they can mean the difference between between canceling and releasing a game, between bankruptcy and the studio’s continued existence.

      • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        298 months ago

        If your success depends on a storefront paying you to sell your game to less people, maybe it is for the best that it doesn’t succeed.

        • DdCno1
          link
          fedilink
          -78 months ago

          Do you see developers making games exclusively for one console manufacturer the same way? Are you willing to deprive the gaming community as a whole from these titles? Games like Shadow of the Colossus or Alan Wake 2 would not have happened without exclusivity.

          • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            148 months ago

            Games like Shadow of the Colossus or Alan Wake 2 would not have happened without exclusivity.

            Bullshit. If the publishers for those games had made them for more platforms, they would have sold more copies. Exclusivity deals are made between console makers and publishers in order to sell more consoles and are an anticompetitive practice that should be illegal.

            • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              Which still may not have recouped development costs. Shadow was on PS2, no other console got close to their sales. Costs to convert it to other platforms may have been more than profit from sales on Xbox and GameCube.

            • DdCno1
              link
              fedilink
              -58 months ago

              No, both of these titles are “halo games” (not in the Bungie series, but in the way that they are showcase titles) that sold poorly compared to their development costs - and their publishers likely knew that these would sell very poorly, but chose to publish them regardless, because they bring prestige to their platforms. They sold poorly, because they are niche games, not due to their platform exclusivity.

              It’s kind of like a car manufacturer making an exclusive sports car that only a few hundred people will buy, but that is meant to elevate the entire brand, bring in customers for other products and wow journalists so that they think of the brand more highly. Most of Sony’s publishing strategy hinges on strong exclusive titles - since their hardware is virtually identical to Microsoft’s - and they started this by going down the “high art” game route all the way back with the PS1 (with extremely niche games like “The Book of Watermarks”) before creating more mainstream blockbuster exclusives like the Uncharted series.

              I get your frustration with this, I have felt it myself with exclusives that I wanted to play, but couldn’t justify the expense of buying a console for, but there are solid reasons from the perspective of developers and publishers for doing it and outlawing this practice would result in a far less vibrant and interesting gaming landscape. Another comparison is how rich aristocrats used to pay artists like Leonardo DaVinci to create art for them. This was also an exclusivity deal of sorts, since most of the public didn’t see these artworks until centuries later (the platform exclusivity was being born to the right kind of family), but without these wealthy, selfish patrons of the arts, mankind would have been deprived of amazing creations.

              • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                118 months ago

                Lol comparing console makers to renaissance art patrons is rich. They are hardware makers and that’s all. They don’t give a shit about great art. They are just trying to have some unique selling points for their locked down platforms so that gaming PCs don’t completely dominate the market. Fuck Sony. Fuck Microsoft. And fuck publishers who sign exclusivity deals. Monopolistic and anticompetitive behaviour doesn’t deserve praise or encouragement.

  • @Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    518 months ago

    Yeah, game publishers are in their “cash out” phase after realizing there’s no competing against steam.

    • @ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      338 months ago

      There is if they’re interested in competing with Steam. Epic made some very competitive offerings for the supply side of things and then provided very little reason for customers to ever shop there, which it turns out is just as, if not more important.

      • @Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        Let me gift games, let me wishlist games to receive gifts. There’s lots of other features I would also like but if other stores had that I’d be much more inclined to use the other stores.

          • Veraxus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            98 months ago

            GOG is great. I do wish Epic would improve their platform, though. It’s like they’re not even trying.

  • @johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    438 months ago

    I really wonder how the palworld devs feel about being gamepass day 1. I have no idea what the payouts look like for them. It probably got a lot more people to try their game, but would they have done better selling it only on steam? They probably weren’t in a position to negotiate a very favorable contract with Microsoft.

    • @djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      458 months ago

      I think that’s looking at the deal in hindsight. Palworld had just as good a chance at flopping completely as hitting #1 worldwide, I imagine they were grateful for the opportunity to have some guaranteed income at the time.

    • @sinceasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 months ago

      Because craftopia and palworld have a social aspect getting a big seed of players who only played it because it was free (for them) was I think a catalyst in making palworld blow up like it did. There are too many games out there for people to look through so it probably helps get word out effectively to sell out cheap for a big initial audience like gamepass when you’re a small dev. I only knew of craftopia or palworld because of gamepass at least

      The flip side is Microsoft is 100% giving the above as a sales pitch to devs why they should put their game on gamepass for peanuts (paid in exposure!). That’s probably some of what drives the shittier deal devs get now

    • @sonovebitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      Their previous game Craftopia was also on GamePass and somewhat successful. They probably had some leverage for negotiations.

  • Suzune
    link
    fedilink
    English
    278 months ago

    Maybe… just not make exclusive deals? Especially not on mediocre game distribution platforms.

    • @MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      208 months ago

      “I talked to at least five small teams, like 35 [members] and under, during GDC, and they’re like: Cuts, cuts, cuts, funding canceled, talks that were going on for a year, canceled,” said Casey Yano, the co-founder of Slay the Spire studio Mega Crit. “It sounds like it’s shit. We’re definitely very privileged to be able to self-fund. [Otherwise] I’d be very, very, very scared right now.”

      If these deals didn’t exist, lots of games simply wouldn’t get made. You can hate on the platforms all you like but the deals are one of the only sources of funding for small & solo developers.

        • @beetus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You do realize those are usually exclusive for only a year, right? So EGS pays them out for a year of exclusivity and then the devs are free to launch on steam and others.

          The thing is, often if they don’t get that first infusion of cash from a deal with EGS (or another investor) they don’t get to complete or even launch the game at all. So it never would make it to the other markets.

          • @Halosheep@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            Usually by the time they’ve made it off EGS, I’ve forgotten they exist. There’s been many sequels to games I loved that I forgot existed because of this.

            • @newcool1230@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              Same, after a few years you see them show up on steam and all the reviews are

              • “All my lobbies are empty”
              • “It takes 30+ mins to get into a game with 2 other players”
              • “I’m only getting matched against bots”
  • The Snark Urge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    258 months ago

    Hawkish monetary policy has a way of making it hard to turn a profit on long horizon projects.

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    -528 months ago

    unknown indie games aren’t selling shitty platforms? you don’t say.

    • dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      468 months ago

      Just because you only know three games, it doesn’t mean the rest of us do too. Slay The Spire, and Darkest Dungeon, are a couple of really well known and community loved indie games. Both excellent examples of what can be done with limited resources

      • @summerof69@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -28 months ago

        How does this contradict what they said though? Just because some niche community knows these games, it doesn’t make them platform-selling games. Valve had HL2 with episodes, Portal, TF2, CS, and Dota 2.

    • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      198 months ago

      These are enormous classics, made by small studio is not the same as unknown game. Sold much more than many triple a games, this is a very dry weak take