• Antik 👾
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For me it’s https://nginxproxymanager.com/ it’s just so easy to setup and use. One docker command and you’re up and running with a nice webinterface to manage access to your docker instances with ssl. I heard good things about Traefik too but I have no personal experience with that one. NPM does everything I need and if it ain’t broken… :)

    Edit: because people love screenshots https://nginxproxymanager.com/screenshots/

    • @lvl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I second that. Amazing easy to use, configure, supports (LetsEncrypt) certificates via DNS-01 challenge and integrates with ease with most DNS providers.

      Paired with authentication providers (keycloak, authelia, authentik), the “advanced” textbox lets you do forward proxying really easy, or customize your “basic proxy”.

      I’m not sure how many of these features are present in Traefik, it would be really nice if any of you know if any of these are easily supported in it:

      • Forward proxying
      • Custom rewrites (nginx internal; rewrites)
      • Unattended DNS-01 support with ACME (LetsEncrypt)
    • D4NM3D
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I’ve been using NPM for years… but since 2.10.3 broke SSL certificates and there’s been literally no interest from JC21 to fix the problem (there’s a PR ready to go) i’ve been forced to look elsewhere and have settled on caddy for now…

      • Mike
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        To be fair, the pull request was last week. It’s inconvenient but life/work balance.

        • D4NM3D
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Agreed but it’s more the worry that it’s been broken for over 3 weeks and the dev(s) seems to have no interest in resolving it… to me that is a bad sign of things to come and projects being abandoned.

          If i’m incorrect and the devs have been vocal about the issue then please correct me and point me to where i should be looking.

          • Mike
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I’m not challenging you, so please don’t take of fence here but is the issue sincerely a ‘lack of interest’ or is it just that NPM is FOSS and the maintainer is bogged down with life? You could fork it and fix it.

            • D4NM3D
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              It’s a very good question and of course… i could fork it and fix it using the PR… but then that would be it… I’m not experienced enough to even achieve that to be honest…

              My issue I guess is not so much with the fact that there is a problem… it’s with the fact that i can’t afford for my homelab to be down because it’s never fixed or takes time to fix… i appreciate all of this is free… i think i may of even donated at some point because i was so thankful it existed… but now it’s such an integral part of my and my families life that i cannot have something in my stack that isn’t going to be fixed rapidly.

              JC21 created an amazing product and if it’s fixed or V3 ever appears i’ll 100% check it out… but for now whilst it’s not as pretty… i have to fall back to caddy.

    • @frap129@lemmy.maples.dev
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I used NPM for a very long time, but after I switched to podman, DNS name resolution for containers stopped working in NPM, they work fine in every other container. Switched to caddy and it’s okay, it only supports HTTP transports so I can’t use it as a gateway for my DoH/DoT server, but that’s not a huge deal. Once NPM works properly on podman I may switch back

  • @Neil@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I’m so used to Nginx I have trouble caring enough to learn anything else. If I were to eventually learn another, Caddy looks like the most attractive option, but I’m super open to hearing from people who have used both Traefik and Caddy.

  • @ycnz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Traefik across 3 nodes internally for its Nomad service discovery. HAProxy for my non-Nomad stuff.

  • @lidstah@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago
    • almost everywhere: HAProxy. I like the syntax, ACLs, map files, stick-tables… there’s too much to say in a single post, but I use it since 2012 and it never failed me, whatever the need, both at home and at work.
    • kubernetes: ingress-nginx. Mostly because it’s the first one I tried back in the days and it just works :). Although I should try one of the haproxy based ingresses, or Traefik, which seems interesting too.
  • ngoomie
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    nginx because I like how flexible it is, and I’d started using it as a webserver for normal file serving + PHP site hosting with php-fpm a good time ago anyways.

    I’d tried Caddy once but the “quirky” flair included even in things like documentation was far too grating for me, plus I honestly just, don’t really like using JSON.

  • @Ekis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I made the switch from NGINX to Caddy. For me, configuring Caddy is much more simple than configuring NGINX. Also Caddy automatically obtains and renews SSL certificates.

    So, Caddy’s simplicity is what won me over. I don’t care about speed since I’m the only user of my self-hosted services.

  • @otterpop@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Like some others have said, I use NGINX due to it’s flexibility and ease of configuration. I want to be able to tweak performance and security settings to be exactly how I want them, and NGINX let’s me do that.

  • @rolaulten@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Let’s see. At work it’s a mix between apache (I’m slowly replacing with nginx as services are migrated) and aws’s alb ingress controller (while I’m not a fan, it lets me use acm certs).

    At home it’s all nginx.

  • nginx. Traefik is near unusable if you ever need something that isn’t dockerized. Caddy seems neat, but I miss some options you get with nginx.

    nginx is just… good in all aspects.

  • @maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I’ve been using caddy for a while. I’ve been really happy with it, it is very small learning curve especially for someone brand new to reverse proxies. Config file syntax is very simple.

    However I’ve been thinking of moving to nginx. After I learned about OpenResty and the possibility to script nginx with Lua, nginx is very tempting. Sadly caddy has nothing similar.

  • poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Nginx, because it works well and most open-source projects provide good examples for it when setting up things.

  • mariom
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Depends ;)

    Private: Traefik, as it was default on k3s and I just get used to it. Work: mostly Nginx

  • @360MustangScope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Caddy, slapping essentially 2 lines into a config file and my reverse proxy is ready for my local network and websites? Can’t really beat that

    When it comes to some services though like my openwrt router, I do use Nginx since it’s far more likely to be available in some places