Should social media platforms only allow upvotes or favorites?

As I understand it, Kbin doesn’t allow downvotes just like Mastodon. Users can only mark a comment or OP favorite (upvote) and the Kbin user can see what account favorited / upvoted their comment or OP. Also if it’s from a Lemmy user by the way.

  • @TheDubz87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    TBH I feel like any social media platform, regardless of voting displays, has the potential to become a toxic environment.

  • @moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    You can’t hide from it on the Internet. I have seen forums where downvotes are visible to everybody and there still was lots of toxicity. One of such forums later moved to no-downvote model and guess what? Downvotes are no longer there but toxic people still are

    On the Internet people don’t know you, what you went through etc. They only see a string of characters as your nickname and it doesn’t help much to make them more understanding

  • HSL
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    We’ve had a number of recent discussions around downvotes and toxicity. Removing this under rule #4.

  • @simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    As I understand it, Kbin doesn’t allow downvotes just like Mastodon.

    Kbin does have downvotes like Lemmy.

    • @Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Yeah, this seems like such an odd claim, because all one has to do is go to Kbin.social and the downvote buttons are right there.

  • Samantha E Xavia
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Kbin does allow downvotes from what I can see and downvotes doesn’t really bring it to a toxic environment as it’s just a way to easily disagree with someone without having to go into depth in the comments. It’s like YouTube videos, if you dislike it doesn’t mean it’s bad, it just means you personally don’t like it.

    • tikitaki
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I think it has the tendency to create a snowball effect. You see a comment with -50 points you are already subconsciously looking at it trying to analyze why everyone hates it. It essentially primes you into disagreeing with it. Sometimes it’s obvious in the case of a troll or someone saying hate speech or something but other times it’s someone sharing a genuine opinion that’s relevant to the discussion but the snowball effect of the first few people downvoting it causes it to spiral downwards.

      By itself it isn’t a bad thing but when comments are ranked based on votes or downvoted comments past a certain threshold are hidden, it contributes to creating echo chambers.

      Personally, I think it’s like that Churchill quote. Democracy is trash and has a lot of problems. But still, it’s the best thing we’ve come up with so far. It’s got its issues but the transparent nature definitely helps if someone is consciously trying to read things with an open mind.

    • harmonea
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      it’s just a way to easily disagree with someone without having to go into depth in the comments.

      This is literally not what downvotes were ever meant to be for.

      Downvotes on a main post = This post doesn’t fit this community.

      Downvotes in comments = This post is off-topic, spreading misinformation or hate, and/or is actively hindering discussion (insults, assholery, etc).