…with the James Web Telescope looking for sources of artificial light to identify potential intelligent life, and the news this week of Perseverance searching for microbial life on Mars it feels like we are getting closer to a major discovery. But what - if anything - would it mean for the religions on Earth if life is proven to exist out there?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, fun fact, St Augustine, who is considered one of the Church Fathers, explicitly argued that if the ‘Antipodes’ (i.e., southern continents not connected to Europe, Asia or Africa) actually existed and had humans living there, that would prove the Gospel was untrue.

    The reason for this is as follows: Christians of his era believed that the reason God had allowed the Romans to destroy the Second Temple and push the Jews into exile was to prepare the men of all nations (as understood at the time) for the coming of the Gospel. The idea was that the Jews had taken the Old Testament, and the prophecies of the Messiah therein, across the whole world. Augustine argues that if the Antipodes contained human beings who had never had any kind of contact with Jews, and therefore no contact with the OT, and no contact with Christians, and therefore no contact with the New Testament, either, that must mean the Gospels are false. Why? Because there’s no conceivable reason that a just God would have deprived entire civilisations of the chance of redemption.

    Of course, we now know that at the time Augustine was writing (4th-5th century AD), there were literally millions of people who had never had the slightest contact with the Jews or Christians and, furthermore, wouldn’t do so for another millennium. So, per Augustine’s argument, all those millions were condemned to Hell (the concept of Purgatory didn’t exist at this point, but condemning them all to no chance of Heaven, just because they were unfortunate to be born a long way away from Jersualem, is clearly also unjust). Either God is incredibly unjust and unmerciful, which means the Gospels are untrue, OR the Good News wasn’t actually spread to all men, which must also mean that they’re not true.

    The upshot of this is that one of the Church Fathers has, in retrospect, irrefutably argued that the Gospels are untrue. The amount of special pleading required to make out that, actually, the Maori or the Easter Islanders or [insert any other uncontacted peoples here] had an opportunity to accept Christ and somehow missed it entirely is far beyond any sane interpretation of the evidence.

    Now, as you might have noticed, this hasn’t stopped people from believing in the Gospels. I don’t see why the discovery of life on another world would dislodge people from a belief that is transparently false when nothing else has.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I remember being taught that Jesus presented himself to the rest of the world after his resurrection and that beyond that ‘the rocks testify’ and that all man is without excuse.

      It always bothered me, even before I began deconstructing, and was one of a few things that never set well with me.

      I’m surprised that in all my study of Augustine I never saw this about him before.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Yes, I always kind of respected the Mormons for at least trying to reconcile the existence of the Native Americans with the New Testament, beyond ‘the rocks testify’, but they also inadvertently showed how absurd the whole idea was by stretching every kind of evidence (biblical, linguistic, genetic, archaeological, etc.) so much to make it work! And of course even that didn’t seem to account for the Polynesians and… well, everyone else.

        I was always especially fond of the idea that Jesus revealed himself to the Aztecs and they somehow got so confused that they ended up worshipping a giant feathered snake instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Thing is, information like this won’t get to everyone, but close to everyone will hear about finding life elsewhere

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Fair point. I thought for a long time that the fact that Christianity simply couldn’t have spread over the globe for a millennium and a half after Christ’s death was a slam dunk argument against its core tenets, though. I cited Augustine here because I thought it was quite funny when I found out that one of the Church Fathers inadvertently agreed with me! It proved to me that my argument wasn’t a case of me indulging in special pleading or anything like that: it really is a good argument.

        Fact is though that all of us, Christian or not, religious or not, find difficulties when it comes to justifying our core beliefs. We constantly adjust to take in new information without really letting it get at our fundamental ideas. I don’t see why discovering alien life would be any different for most people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Thank you for this brief history lesson! I had never heard of St. Augustine and his treatise.

      How do you think his argument fares now that the concept of purgatory exists?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    601 year ago

    Religion would change if religious people learn to look beyond 6 feet in front of them, but I guess that’s less possible than proof of extraterrestrial life.

    • curiosityLynx
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Not all religious people are the Westborough Baptists, rabid creationists, prosperity gospel followers and massive hypocrites you know personally. Nor are the rest all militant fundamentalists who think terrorism is a good idea.

      There are Jains, parts of the Salvation Army and many more that are perfectly reasonable and don’t go against anything science has to say. Because at the end of the day, religions and science have very little overlap, as most religious beliefs can neither be proven nor disproven.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        I agree and disagree as well.

        Religion as it is refers to a way of life. Ideally what your way of life is should not change with what others do or not do.

        But realistically, what we have seen is that religion lets people justify their own shortcomings just because they are part of a secret group and then force their “way of life” on others.

        At the same time, holding onto a single “way of life” is intrinsically prone to mistakes, since we are never given complete knowledge about everything and will never have it. We need to change constantly to be better versions of ourselves.

        If there are people who believe in something greater than them, and are prepared to change if they have the necessary proof, then I’m afraid I can’t call them religious. I’d call them spiritual.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    Same as every other times when science have disproven religions fairytales. They adapt. God also made those lifeforms

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    Will proof of aliens change the brainwashed ultra religious? Not a chance. Hell, there are flatearthers and election deniers. I don’t expect much from about 30% of our population.

    • dub
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yea im not too optimistic that this would do anything for most true believers

  • Religion will just claim God made aliens, too.

    Or that they’re a test for the faithful. The way some do about dinosaur fossils.

    I am also fully convinced that religious people could scientifically discover God and not believe it’s actually God, so…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Yeah, stories in some religious are so vague that they can be applied to any thing. Some of them are vague enough that religious leaders will have no trouble just telling their followers that existence of aliens was already told in them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Pope Francis has already said that if intelligent life is found, that they would also be considered children of God, so you’re right on your first point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, stories in some religious texts are so vague that they can be applied to any thing. Some of them are vague enough that religious leaders will have no trouble just telling their followers that existence of aliens was already told in them.

    • Poplar?
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      What does it mean to scientifically discover god?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      To expand on this, every stretch will be made to re-enforce their beliefs.

      Aliens are bipedal? Intelligent design!

      Aliens have mouths? intelligent design!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I’ve already seen religious people mixing christianity with ancient alien theory, claiming the aliens are really fallen angels, demons or nephilim, some woukd probably persist in this

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    I think a lot of religious people will reason it this way- “Yes, there are aliens, but God chose us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      They would just claim god created them, too. They already did this with the universe when the whole thing about there being other stuff than the earth came up.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Right, but you also need the whole “we were saved by Jesus” or “we were God’s chosen people” or whatever from the various religions. You have to maintain that by saying there may be aliens, but we’re the ones that God favors.

        • curiosityLynx
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Not necessarily. Alternatively:

          • You can say that we’re the only ones who needed saving.
          • You can claim they’re angels or demons (if they’re older than humanity)
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Exactly this. I know a guy who is a Christian but also believes in extraterrastial life saying that ayy lmaos are also Gods children. Every time he talks about it my head starts to spin.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I look forward to the aliens response being something along the lines of, “You’re God’s best boys and girls, yes you are, who are blessed little ape-beings? You are, yes all of you.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Religions are unlikely to change substantially, I imagine they’ll just find some way to explain the existence of aliens that fits their existing scriptures and world view.

    There will be new religions that pop up as a result though, for sure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    Did other advances in human knowledge change them?

    Most of them still think the universe was made in 6 days by a bearded toga dude in the sky and if you are gay you are going to magical underground fire place.

  • Chainweasel
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    In general I think it would just give religions a new group to hate. They would be “Creatures not of God, but of the Devil Himself” in the same way that Christians think of other religions as born of the Canaanites and influenced by Satan.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Nothing. As long as people are scared of dying and other people are willing to profit from it, religion has a home