• Tetra
    link
    fedilink
    1388 months ago

    Strange way to say it’s just not good enough to get awards. I’m not “ghosted” by the Michelin guides every year, my cooking just isn’t that good.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      418 months ago

      The fact that awards are just assumed for any big title in spite of a decidedly lacklustre reception says a lot about the industry.

      • Paranomaly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        The Game Awards is by no means innocent of this, but it has glimmers of sincerity at times and this is one of them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    To add to other comments, Bethesda NPCs haven’t aged well. Especially when they’re right next to Baldur’s Gate 3 NPCs. Starfield left a lot to be desired. Can’t believe we’ve been lacking ES for this

    • Volkditty
      link
      fedilink
      298 months ago

      I stopped playing BG3 to try Starfield when it came out. I got through the intro, landed at that first populated world, and stopped to talk to a janitor at the train station. She said something like, “Boy, I sure would like a cappuccino from TeraBrew!” and a quest tracker popped up for me to go buy her a cup of coffee. I delivered it to her and she gave me a bag of apple slices that healed 1 HP or some shit.

      I went back to playing BG3.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        148 months ago

        Its fucking jarring. Same story here. Stopped my BG3 cause my friend begged me. I said nah and he let me remote play it to try it out. I instantly recognized the same bullshit from all the way back to Oblivion out of the NPCs. They just feel dated now. Especially next to BG3 who probably put a ton of work into their NPCs.

    • VaultBoyNewVegas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      278 months ago

      I’ve no faith in Bethesda anymore. I played about 25 hours in Starfield and had finished the ranger questline and felt that is so shallow. Then I started thinking about all the quests that I did and how they didn’t change or lead to anything. If Bethesda don’t change how they structure quests then I won’t play any of their future RPGs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The name of the game has changed. Its no longer about shoving stuff in a big world. Players of the genre want their choices to matter in an adaptive world. Bethesda didn’t get the memo they were so caught up in their empty dream sandbox.

        Edit: I should also add expected AI behavior is evolving. After Rain World, I notice bland AI.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 months ago

          It used to be that if you wanted an open world game you had a handful of options, and for RPGs Fallout and Elder Scrolls were really the only options. Nowadays we have more open world games than you can shake a stick at. Bethesda doesn’t seem to realize that the rest of the industry has caught up with and passed them in a lot of ways

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            68 months ago

            20 years ago this was Bethesda’s style. They were the open-world rpg simulation. Now and Indie Dev can drop 6 character models and 6 objects into a game engine and have similar functionality in maybe a month. Two weeks if its hunkering down like a game jam. Technology has surpassed their products. They need to do something to spice it up or ES 6 is gonna bomb.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              I’m convinced I’ll still be playing Skyrim in 2035 when TES6 is released. There are so many mods due to come out in the next 3 years.

      • Nate Cox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        Same, I wanted to like starfield very much but it just felt hollow.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Maybe you just need to upgrade your PC

      EDIT: Damn, really didn’t think I’d need the /s for this one

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Man if it ran on a toaster people would be bitching that these toasters are holding the game back why aren’t they not using the full power of my new Gen console/$2000 RTX PC?!

          Can’t fucking win.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            98 months ago

            It’s fine to require newer hardware but the game has to justify it. You can’t have a game that looks like Starfield and claim it needs a high end system to run when games like BG3 and Cyberpunk also exist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah… No. I agree that people will always bitch about shit, but Starfield released with many optimization issuses worth bitching about. Such as flatout bad memory allocation (causing it to misalign with the CPU page size), an incorrect imlementation of DirectX12’s ExecuteIndirect feature causing major issues with GPU’s, and some insanely stupid choices regarding basic customization features (why do you have to change the resolution of your desktop to play the game in full screen at your desired resolution ffs!?).

            If it was a case of the game being so cutting edge it needed top of the line hardware that would be one thing. But frankly it was just so poorly optimized that they hoped top of the line hardware would mitigate their quality control issues.

            Thank Vivec for modders at least, as this has been Bethesda’s MO for decades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    568 months ago

    According to the article, Starfield was still nominated for best RPG… so, not really ghosted. More like they got the participation award for the unfinished, under-baked game they put out.

    It would have been insulting to the other devs if they were nominated for GOTY, because Starfield isn’t even in the same league as the other nominees and Bethesda should play those to see what an actual polished game feels like.

  • JJROKCZ
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    388 months ago

    Because they ghosted us when we asked where the rest of this “25 year dream” game was

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    338 months ago

    I mean, the best thing about Starfield for me was that watching the trailer inspired me to fire up No Man’s Sky again after a couple years away.

    But I guess sensational headlines get more clicks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    258 months ago

    It’s just not an exceptional game… I get that some like it, it has some great bits like the ship builder and the improved gunplay since Fallout4, but overall it falls short. Starfield’s greatest flaw isn’t the constant loading screens, the limited role playing mechanics, the dated engine, the empty planets, or the 10 other things people were dunking on it when it came out. You can definitely feel the death by a 1000 cuts, but it’s major flaw for me is that the game is just bland, boring, and safe which in 2023 (especially for this type of story driven game) is unforgivable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      I think it could be a massive playground for modders if they release the creation kit. But it used to be that modders fixed Bethesda games. Now they have to create all the content as well because Starfield is empty.

  • Metal Zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Was it because… It was a steaming plate of nothing? Hilarious that Bethesda used to be the gold standard for gaming, but they’re still stuck in 2011

  • Chloyster [She/Her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    198 months ago

    I honestly do love the game but like, this year was stacked lol. I had a blast with it but other stuff was better

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Likewise, I’m enjoying it but it just doesn’t deserve any awards in a year when other games that are simply better came out. It’s a firmly mid tier game and it was (not) awarded accordingly.

  • poo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    Lol because it was not a good game.

  • NegativeLookBehind
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    Bethesda tactic: Half-ass your game development and let the modders finish the work without having to pay them!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      Bethesda tactic: Half-ass your game development and let the modders finish the work without having to pay them!

      Even better: Those modders pay for the privilege to mod the game in the first place!

    • Zorque
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      Then re-release it for the next several decades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Maybe they’ll kill gamebryo now.

    Oh who am I kidding, they’ll just say they made it better for ES6

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Gamebryo is the least of their problems, making soulless triple A games is what is plaguing Bethesda and Arkane now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    Man, I wish Todd would invite himself just like EA did with their starwars battlefront 2 ads in the middle of the event. It would be fun to see everyone deflecting questions such as “what did you like about starfield?”