• Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    521 year ago

    Wait is this a thing, have they said this already? (I fully assume they will but missed it if they already have)

      • Scrubbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 year ago

        Yeah, but has threads made an official statement like this yet on defederation rules? I’m an instance owner so I’m pretty sure I’d just reply back “lol”

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 year ago

          I saw that mentioned on Mastodon, but honestly don’t care enough about Threads to actually look at their TOS. Seems likely though given they’re all about making it as bland and corporate friendly as possible.

          • Scrubbles
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            no of course not, it’s obvious, I was just surprised they already said the quiet part out loud, right now they seem to be all “buddy buddy” like we’re all stupid

            • @Jimbo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              101 year ago

              Well there are apparently users here who want to see Threads content. I don’t know why you would want that, and here of all places…

              • Scrubbles
                link
                fedilink
                English
                121 year ago

                I mean, I wish celebrities were jumping on other options rather than “ooo shiny new facebook”, they’re the only ones I would personally follow, but other than that if you want to follow me choose a platform that federates

              • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                They can sign up a free account on Threads, no need to bring that here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Exactly. Every instance will defederate from another if they are not acting in the way that they want. I don’t see why Threads would be any different.

        I guess the difference may be that the policies are much more restrictive rather than something like “is a frequent source of spam and hate speech” but there is always going to be a policy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Yea but the difference is most instances have ethical reasons for banning certain content.

      Meta could randomly decide anti-meta content doesn’t belong on their platform. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is already the case.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    I’ll believe it when I see it. The fact they allowed it the first step on the majority of instances(by user count) means when we cool off they will win the next step too.

    • Dodecahedron December
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Think of meta like reddit. Don’t want to be on facebook via federation? Just post jonny O or NSFW. Not like facebook is going to do anything but defederate from your instance. Kind of like how all instances work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m surprised that nsfw spam is a viable trick. It makes sense, it just feels so weird to be viable. I’d expect it to mysteriously become against the rules as per my above post though. I’d prefer to talk about meta and their help towards genocide etc though. I’ll have to start making a list of their dirty deeds.

        • Dodecahedron December
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Thats some good stuff for a bot to keep signing up and posting to facebook proper. But don’t listen to me I have bad ideas

      • skye
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        i think that’s Calckey, another microblogging software like Mastodon with an arguably prettier interface