• db2
          link
          fedilink
          -781 year ago

          That’s exactly what it means.

          A false flag operation is an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party. The term “false flag” originated in the 16th century as an expression meaning an intentional misrepresentation of someone’s allegiance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Honestly I wouldn’t put anything past Steve or his Reddit admins these days. Its not like their recent actions have proven them to be bastions of high intelligence. Or even low intelligence for that matter.

            • db2
              link
              fedilink
              -251 year ago

              What’s the point of alienating the users who provided and moderated their content for free? What’s the point of making the site unusable for blind users?

              Look at what the qanon crazies were doing just a couple years ago. It’s no different. They don’t care if they’re right, or if the whole place burns to the ground, as long as you’re wrong. They can and have gone to ridiculous lengths towards that end.

              A press release to create a false narrative costs literally nothing, and spez has been trying to do that from day one. The interview he lied about for example. Also, people were meant to believe it was the uppity “landed gentry” behind the alleged hacking. Surely you can see that much.

              • Usually when you do a false flag, you’re pointing blame at a specific group. They never named the group, and it’s not like they are doing the plot of Hackers and blaming every hacker in existence.

                It’s more reasonable to believe this hacker group made it up to try and get publicity or money.

              • Lvxferre
                link
                fedilink
                9
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s the point of alienating the users who provided and moderated their content for free?

                To get rid of what Reddit Inc. perceives as a hostile faction, preventing it from taking full control over the platform, so it can show its investors “WE DID IT REDDIT! WE DEFEATED THEM! The platform is now under our full corporate control, IPO here I come~”.

                I also think that Reddit Inc.'s upper caste didn’t expect things to blow so much out of control.

                What’s the point of making the site unusable for blind users?

                None. Reddit simply doesn’t care about them.

                A press release to create a false narrative costs literally nothing, and spez has been trying to do that from day one. The interview he lied about for example. Also, people were meant to believe it was the uppity “landed gentry” behind the alleged hacking. Surely you can see that much.

                While I don’t think that false-flagging would be “too immoral” for Reddit Inc., it sounds pointless - like, does its upper caste really care if people believe that the landed gentry was trying to hack the site? I don’t think so.


                Let’s use Ockham’s Razor here: it’s simply more probable that the “hacker group” was not Reddit Inc., but someone else bluffing.

                • Spaceman Spiff
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Yeah, all of these other explanations seem WAY more complicated than needed.

          • FujiTive
            link
            fedilink
            351 year ago

            Yup, false flag means a completely different thing as you have just written here

              • @[email protected]
                shield
                M
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Hi!
                I want to remind you all to keep the discussions civilized! If this repeats we are forced to remove uncivilized comments.
                Thanks!

                • db2
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -51 year ago

                  That wasn’t uncivil. The user behaved in a confused manner much like one would when inebriated. If that were the case then you handle a drunk person differently than a sober one.

              • Setarkus.LW
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                I don’t think they’d expected you to mean reddit made it all up. I didn’t either, but with what’s been happening I wouldn’t be as surprised anymore…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        I understand what you mean, but I believe Reddit themselves confirmed the breach. If Reddit didn’t pay up, then the data has been/is being auctioned off on the dark web.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    We haven’t learned anything new since June. The BlackCat ransomware group claimed responsibility for the hack. They didn’t expect Reddit to pay the ransom. So, like trifictional said, sold on the dark web is the most likely outcome. But there’s no public indication that’s happened yet. My best guess is they’re waiting for Reddit’s IPO to get closer to try and get a bigger payout for the data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    It was likely just a lie. Hacker groups often make claims they cannot backup, just for clout. If they had delivered on their promise we would have heard about it by now.