The absolute worst possible time for system and game updates is when I am booting up the device or starting a game.

My Fedora and Windows OSs both give you a “update and shut down” option. This is the best time to do updates.

When Steam is a desktop program, it obviously is not involved in the OS and not aware when you are shutting down but when Steam IS the OS? Seems like a fairly obvious inclusion.

Now obviously there can be additional mandatory updates between startups, but this would at least help to minimize those.

Why is this not standard? Is this something the community could develop? Maybe via plug-in?

  • DeconceptualistEnglish
    12•10 months ago

    Totally agreed, this is one of the most annoying things left about Steam and especially the Deck.

    It’s usually not too bad since you can pause downloads. But if the game you want to play has multiple GB of patches to download you could be stuck waiting a while.

    • @[email protected]OP
      3•10 months ago

      Pause downloads, and then what? Let it sit there and download them when you’re done and then have to come back later and turn it off.

      • skulblaka
        4•10 months ago

        Playstation, Xbox and Switch all download and install updates during sleep mode. Deck should be able to do that as well. If you’re worried about battery life, only allow sleeping downloads when plugged in. Problem solved.

      • DeconceptualistEnglish
        1•10 months ago

        If you’re in desktop mode you can schedule a shutdown. But I’m not aware of a way to trigger it based on a finished Steam download queue unfortunately.

  • @[email protected]
    8•10 months ago

    I remember a time Windows pushed a major update on my laptop as I was about to sleep. I wrote a routine that shuts down my laptop after about 30 minutes, so I can unplug the machine while Youtube or something is on as I fall asleep. Well, it backfired at that time as I had to re-awake after 30 minutes, and plug the machine back in. It was stuck at 30% for a while. “You’re 30% there”. I’m 30% there? It’s not me, it’s you, you stupid OS!

  • conciselyverbose
    3•10 months ago

    I get your idea, but I don’t think I’ve ever had an update take more than maybe a minute.

    • @[email protected]OP
      6•10 months ago

      I’ve definitely spent more than a few minutes staring at an update screen after I sat down, not to mention games that won’t launch before completing a 30GB+ update.

      • conciselyverbose
        1•10 months ago

        Games are different. You can set whether you want it to download while you play, or you can just leave it on the download screen plugged in at the end of the day to update everything.

        • @[email protected]OP
          5•10 months ago

          Yes I’m aware of how the update system works.

          Downloading while I play is going to severely limit performance.

          I don’t want my SD left on all day. I want it off.

                • skulblaka
                  7•10 months ago

                  That’s definitely not true because there isn’t a computer system that exists in the world that is designed for true 24/7 uptime, and the meaningful benefit to shutting it down is both lack of power consumption and system stability. If you keep it on 24/7 it’s going to start crashing frequently after a few months of uptime and you’ll be paying for a non negligible amount of power you’ve used for no reason.

                  Edit: I stand by my power consumption statement, but re: uptime, my Windows centric history is showing. The Linux gang has shown up to correct me and they should be listened to.