Summary

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum suggested imposing retaliatory tariffs if Trump follows through on his threat of 25% import duties on Mexican goods.

Sheinbaum emphasized Mexico’s efforts to curb migration and drug trafficking, framing fentanyl as a U.S. public health issue and criticizing U.S. spending priorities.

She warned tariffs could harm both nations’ economies, especially their intertwined auto industries, and stressed the importance of dialogue.

Trump threatened to impose tariffs on Mexico and Canada, citing concerns about drug and migrant flows, but the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement prohibits such actions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    103
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Golly, you don’t suppose the outcome of this trade squabble could push Mexico straight into China’s loving embrace, thereby achieving exactly the opposite of the ostensible goals of the trump tariffs? All whilst driving up prices in the US? Do you??

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      No, definitely not. The only way to lower prices is to raise them drastically. You see, if you don’t let these supposed “economists” and “third graders who understand addition” tell you otherwise, you can easily see that this is a fucking brilliant plan. That’s why the astute American public bought it. Because they’re so educated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The current agreement (known as USMCA or NAFTA 2.0) was signed in 2018 and took effect in 2020. Trump wants to use the 6-year renegotiation provision that is in the deal to fuck with Canada and Mexico even more than the current deal does.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        That explains why Canada is being treated in the same way that Mexico, if the US wants to apply the tarifs in the USMCA treat it had to be applied to both

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          if the US wants to apply the tarifs in the USMCA treat it had to be applied to both

          I’m not sure that it’s mandatory (within the agreement) that tariffs must be unilateral. I suspect the orange asshole is simply doing it to both nations so that he appears to be taking a strong stance on the “Buy American” mantra.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            I’m not an expert on international commerce, but I don’t think it make sense to have a multinational trade aggrentment where every country have different deals with each other

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              True.

              The same could be said of a multi-national agreement that gets revisited every six years at the whim of one leader.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    I’m sure my Canadian Government will follow this up with a strongly worded letter to the Americans asking if it’s OK if they impose tariffs, too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    Trump keeps praising McKinley for his tariffs, but I guess he completely forgot that it famously failed, caused prices to skyrocket for all Americans, and the Republican party handily lost in midterms and the next election.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    That’s exactly how tariffs work. 2 countries fucking themselves over to see who has the bigger dick. China will impose tariffs also on us.