If you don’t have this kit you will be bombarded to Temu’s ads

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1154 minutes ago

    Go into uBO settings and then filters and enable all the non-language filters. You won’t need privacy badger or that cookie addon anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    243 minutes ago

    Anyone know if there is a proper solution to block ads on twitch? ublock doesn’t work for me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      242 minutes ago

      without an extension you can grab the whole page as a PDF before it loads the paywall. you can also use Ctrl+A and Ctrl+V or the reading view function :]

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    017 minutes ago

    Just using the Brave browser takes care of a few of these by itself and without add-ons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 hours ago

      it’s not like a tempmail it’s like proxy email to hide your actual email. So if you sign up for spam the spam will reach your actual email.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        I don’t see its usefulness, uBlock Origin’s “Cookie Notices” list does the same thing.

        For consent forms consent-o-matic is better, IDCAC / ISDCAC was not created for this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            258 minutes ago

            Consent-o-matic is about consent forms, so it’ll fill the consent forms giving, by default, the least consent possible. If it doesn’t know how to handle a form it’ll just not auto-fill it so you’ll have to do it yourself. It’s not just about cookies, they are just one common way to acquire the data. IDCAC will just hide the form, because it was made to hide cookie notices and later extended to do the same for consent forms. According to the law not filling the form, not giving explicit consent, is like refusing it.

            Anyway, none of these extension touch cookies directly, they are only about notice and consent forms. It’s up to the website to act accordingly. And none of this will do anything about necessary cookies, or more precisely, about any data deemed necessary, however it’s collected.

    • PSoul•Memes
      link
      fedilink
      45 hours ago

      Ok any tips on how to manage email addresses to minimize their exposure and spam?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 hours ago

        Don’t give out your email to spammers. Most legitimate businesses might send quite a lot of mail, but it’s very often easy to unsubscribe so do that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 hours ago

        Yeah, use an email relay service like Firefox Relay, SimpleLogin, the one from Proton if you have an account with them (that’s SimpleLogin behind)…

        You can create email aliases, that will relay the email to your main address. Create a new alias for each website so they can’t use your email address to correlate your identity and you can close it anytime, you can even configure an alias to only allow a set amount of messages and auto-close afterward.

      • Veloxization
        link
        fedilink
        15 hours ago

        Addy.io gives you email aliases as not to expose your actual email address. Everything gets funnelled into a single inbox of your choosing still. And the great thing is that if you use a unique email alias for all services, you know instantly who leaked your email address if you start getting spam. :D

        • the post of tom joad
          link
          fedilink
          66 hours ago

          FF blocks Facebook et al widgets in strict mode now? This is news to me, news indeed. Thanks for the tip

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 hours ago

            Not exactly.

            uBlock Origin blocks the widgets (with the “EasyList – Social Widgets” blocklist, I don’t remember if it’s on by default). As would any other blocklist based blocked do like Privacy Badger, uBO is just better.

            FF’s strict mode has something called Total Cookie Protection that makes it so Facebook widget on site A cannot read the cookie dropped by the Fackebook widget on site B. It isolate 3rd party cookies for each website.

    • Brewchin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      EDIT: Ignore my blind confidence. CAD is (mostly) broken in recent FF versions. (See ivn’s reply to this post).

      Consent-o-Matic with Cookie Auto Delete and Firefox’s Multi-Account Container tabs covers it all nicely for me.

      Cookie banners get handled, cookies I don’t explicitly want to keep automatically disappear when I leave the site/close the tab, and those I do want to keep can be given their own containers to keep them separated.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        228 hours ago

        Cookie autodelete doesn’t work with strict mode and you should use strict mode. Just drop it.

        You don’t need an extension to auto remove cookies with Firefox.

        • Brewchin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 hours ago

          You’re right. I’ll be damned. That’ll teach me to set-and-forget then not keep up with changes to Firefox and their effects on extensions. Thanks for the heads up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 hours ago

            Here’s how to auto-delete cookies without an extension: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/128.0/user.js#L669

            Set privacy.sanitize.sanitizeOnShutdown and privacy.clearOnShutdown_v2.cookiesAndStorage (I don’t know if privacy.clearOnShutdown.cookies is still needed) to true. To allow a website to keep cookies do CTRL+I on the address bar then check “Set cookie” in the Permissions tab.

    • Trespasser 🥉OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 hours ago

      I use uBlock Origin’s picker mode instead. It lets you select which element you want block. It works on other annoying notices, popus and annoying stuff not just cookie notices

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          198 hours ago

          it would illegal if cookie apply before you accept, so just hide should work.

          but bet they do it anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    227 hours ago

    Ublock origin already has privacy badger and no cookies functionality. Worst case nothing gets blocked. Also slower internet for you.

  • lime!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    399 hours ago

    IDCAC should not be on this list since it was compromised, ABP-style. consent-o-matic is probably better but the most direct replacement is “I Still Don’t Care About Cookies”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 hours ago

      Doesn’t the “EasyList/uBO – Cookie Notices” filter in uBlock’s settings do the same thing as IDCAC / consent-o-matic?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        Cookie notices and consent forms are two different things. The first comes from the ePrivacy Directive while the second comes from the GDPR. Consent forms are not only about cookies, the law doesn’t even specify cookies and it’s often using confusing phrasing (like “allow to use personal data collected through cookies or other means”).

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 hours ago

        iI think consentomatic scripts the opt-out interaction. idcac probably just hides the popup.