• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 hours ago

    Remember, take extra care not to forget capitalization and formatting, spelling Jell-O™ as jello, for instance, greatly increases the risk of genericization

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2522 hours ago

    Okay but like, when I ask for a Sharpie I do not want to be handed just any piece of shit marker.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1119 hours ago

    I view this as a checklist of brand names that require additional assistance in falling off of the trademark cliff and crashing down onto the rocks of common usage below.

  • moosetwin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1223 hours ago

    TIL ping pong is actually called table tennis, I thought that was an entirely different sport

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 day ago

    So what tips it over the edge into losing the trademark? Cause many of those things on the at risk list are completely generic in common parlance already.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      922 hours ago

      I have no idea how it actually works, but I would guess a court ruling or something invalidating the trademark. I don’t think the USPTO would just go around stripping trademarks for funsies, but if one got challenged in court that could very well lead to a judgement like “yeah, a popsicle is just so broadly understood as this class of thing you don’t have ownership over that anymore”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 day ago

      At a guess? Someone trying to enforce it and failing. I don’t think there’s any hard cutoff, because it would be nigh impossible to measure; you’d just have to do a vibe check for a jury or trademark office.