I’ll go first. I’ve used a lot of search engines, I used duckduckgo for quite some time but found their search results kinda bad. I’m currently using ecosia the search results are similar to ddg’s but at least I’m planting trees, so there’s that.

      • noodlejetski
        1•2 years ago

        yup. or rather their short form, !g and !a in your example, because no one’s got time to type out the entire names (:

  • @cereals@lemmy.mlEnglish
    5•2 years ago

    Most small search engines use bing results which are a hit or miss compared to Google.

    Startpage is the only privacy focused one I found that uses Google search results. The UI is fine for the most part, except the image search maybe.

    Edit: typo

  • @Adi2121@lemmy.mlEnglish
    5•2 years ago

    I’ve been using SearXNG. It is a fork of SearX, a popular open source metasearch search engine. Basically SearX allows you to use multiple search engines for a search, and only the results are there, no ads. SearXNG changes the UI to be better, adds some other engines for a variety of things to search, like images. Currently I’m using ericafteric.top as my instance; it is the fastest US instance with search suggestions support since I can’t selfhost.

    • @pimeys@beehaw.orgEnglish
      3•2 years ago

      I run my own SearXNG instance too. I set it up to a Hetzner box, then blocked all ports from the firewall except on the Tailscale network. This means the machine which wants to use the search needs to be connected first to the same Tailscale network. It allows me to prevent being blocked by the search providers for too much traffic and is been working great. I just open http://SearXNG from my browser and start searching.

  • Rats
    5•2 years ago

    Duckduckgo for the most part, especially if I already know where I want to get to. Google as a backup like others are saying.

  • nullishcatEnglish
    4•2 years ago

    Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

    • Actual privacy
    • No BS like with DDG
    • AI features (like a “quick answer” feature that’s really useful)
    • Has its own index along with others
    • Search results are great, probably better than DDG’s
    • “Lenses” (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
    • Devs are pretty cool
    • @DengueDucky@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2•2 years ago

      I want to give it a try but it’s hard to justify the cost with limited searches. I don’t want to have to keep track of how many times I’ve searched or second guess if I “really need to search for that”.

    • RickEnglish
      2•2 years ago

      For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I’ve been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.

      Edit: The pricing is… very… meh.

    • NinaEnglish
      1•2 years ago

      I was using DuckDuckGo and it was giving me pretty ‘eh’ results, only marginally better than google on the surface level, but both weren’t really usable for deep older searches. (and ddg starting to add sus ads/promoted) Brave is better, but Kagi has been fantastic when I’ve really needed to find something specific, technical, or very old. I think the best way to come about the pricing structure and limited search results is that I think it’s not supposed to be your only search engine from then on. There are times when you need what kagi gives in terms of producing quality and relevant results, and times you just wanna search “[company name] reviews/is a scam?” that using kagi wouldn’t serve you better than anything else, so it’s more of a tool that you bring out when you aren’t finding what you need with free search engines. On it’s own page it doesn’t try and oversell you on it, they admit that the majority of people don’t need paid search most of the time.

      I haven’t approached if it’s an early netflix thing where you could split the bill with others for one login/family plan, that might make it more feasible.

    • @smoke_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      1•2 years ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now and I love it. When I think about how much of my life revolves around accurate information, the price is negligible.

    • PumpkinOPEnglish
      1•2 years ago

      I didn’t know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that’s really cool. Do you think it’s worth the money?

      • nullishcatEnglish
        1•2 years ago

        Bit biased cause I’ve had it for a while and have a ‘legacy plan’. But even without that, absolutely.

      • @zarquon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1•2 years ago

        It’s only a few bucks a month. I think so.

        The only thing I don’t like is needing to be logged in to search. That always feels like a huge invasion of privacy. The at least claim that they don’t log search contents though

  • rhythmisaprancer
    3•2 years ago

    Another DuckDuckGo user here. I really like it but wish I could use boolean with it.

    • mego_pie
      2•2 years ago

      You can, it just works a bit differently than google if that is what you’re used to. It doesn’t outright exclude results with -, just de-emphasizes it in the results, of course with how tailored many web pages are to gaming search algorithms that doesn’t do much. If you want to outright eliminate certain websites from the search you can do that with -site:siteyouwantgone.here

  • gibandaley
    3•2 years ago

    DuckDuckGo, but I’ve been testing Qwant (also privacy focused) lately as well.

  • @Kissaki@feddit.deEnglish
    3•2 years ago

    DuckDuckGo

    I also use Firefox search bookmarks for searching specific sites.

    Search Bookmark: You prepare the URL with a %s placeholder and give the bookmark a tag, and you can type tag searchterm and it’ll open it.

    I’m using it for opening word definitions, word translations, searching reference documentation, searching specific platforms/websites/media types, etc.

      • darcmage
        2•2 years ago

        Isn’t that hard to determine without specifying which engines are used in your chosen instance? Searx/Searng has provided superior results for me using a combination of engines compared to anything provided by any of the alternatives by themselves.

      • teoriaEnglish
        2•2 years ago

        It can literally use any search engine you think of as a backend, so its strictly higher quality? Unless thats what you meant

  • Phil L.English
    3•2 years ago

    Ecosia on my tablet because of nice integrated browser and DuckDuck+Firefox on the PC

    Am also checking out Brave on PC at the moment