You must log in or register to comment.
American’s will literally do anything but build public transportation.
Taking cars off the road by reducing vehicle reliance seems like such a cost-effective solution that we just don’t want to consider.
Either way, you want the people who will not convert to public transportation to use more efficient cars, so it’s not a bad thing.
The country is just too big for that to happen everywhere. It would be immensely helpful in some cities and it’s disappointing that it’s being neglected.
Is that it?
It’s one of a large number of actions. Individually, most of these aren’t much. Added together, they’re a lot.
My 2006 ford fiesta got more than 50mpg. Even accounting for the smaller US gallon, the idea that car manufacturers need any more time, and cannot build them today, was my point.
$600 less in gas costs over the lifetime of a car? Isn’t that a rather small amount? Less than one tank of gas per year… Are they comparing a 50 mpg car to a modern car or to a hypothetical future car with better gas mileage?
They’re comparing a 45 mpg car to a 65 mpg car I believe, I think they’re just re reporting this press release. Still sounds a little low though, some back of the napkin math assuming gas is $3/gallon would still suggest you’d save that much after only like 30,000 miles. Savings would be more if you drove your car further than that over its life or if gas was more expensive.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/new-fuel-economy-standards-model-years-2027-2031
The Washington post article and the nhsta press release are confusing, 50 mpg isn’t the standard, that’s just the average mpg for the mix of cars and trucks they expect to be sold in 2031.
The standards are increasing to 65 mpg for cars over time (there are yearly increases that gradually get there) and 45 mpg for light trucks/suvs. Heavy trucks and vans are also getting higher percent increases in required mpg average, though begining from a lower floor. The mix of all of the vehicle classes bring sold together will average to 50 mpg, which is where the Washington post gets that number.
Nyt article and the actual rule draft both have a lot more details.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/07/climate/biden-mileage-electric-vehicles.html
