Was it fascinating? Did it feel like the amazing future? Were you all too aware of the mounting cost relative to what you were actually doing?

  • @nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    287 months ago

    I ran a single line BBS system in the Seattle area in my early teens which was early '90s. At the peak we were averaging about 20 calls a day and I kept the whole thing running for a few years. I had a four drive CD-ROM tower system loaded up with shareware CD archives and a connection to fidonet, so you could exchange email with anyone else who had a fidonet address around the world. It was freaking cool and the skills I learned building that prepared me to jump into IT during the .com boom which was a pretty lucky career break for a teen in Seattle.

    That era was the tail end of the golden days of BBS systems because Prodigy and CompuServe followed quickly and what they had was professional content creators and some of the first integrations for buying airline tickets, stocks, reading the news, and functional email that reached a wider audience. At that time, you have to remember there was no other way to access those services in real time. Your only other source for this would have been TV or newspapers, or picking up the phone and calling a travel agent.

    A lot of these services’ business model was selling hours of access. So you might pay 30 bucks a month for 50 hours, and if you stayed online longer you’d pay more. Those numbers were fine because after you finished whatever you wanted to do, there was nothing left to look at so it was easy to log back off. Very few people were leaving anything resembling an instant messenger logged in all the time.

    Those services were constantly updating so every time you logged in you’d see new games, photo libraries, user-generated content in their forums. But in the end they were essentially overgrown BBS’s with funding.

    All of them, including AOL, tried to stay relevant by adding the internet as soon as it became a little more mainstream to talk about. But within a fairly short period of time, maybe about a year, the content available on the wider internet from major sources outpaced whatever Prodigy, CompuServe and AOL could produce on their own, so most people logged in just to bypass and get to the internet.

    The next generation of getting online after that was subscribing directly to a local ISP for a dial-up account.

    As I think back to this, we knew the future was coming fast, but nobody seemed to really understand what that would entail. Absolutely nobody was envisioning services to come like cloud storage, social media, non-stop connectivity from your pocket etc. That was basically sci-fi movie stuff. Connectivity was simply too slow, and we didn’t even have high-res pics or videos stored on our computers at the time. Photos were still taken on film, and video was stored on magnetic tape. It was still very analog and very few people could afford the hardware to digitize it. Early scanners were crappy, only black and white, and expensive.

    The most incredible services to launch at the beginning were the chat systems and forums, and online shopping. Clicking on a picture of a cool thing, Entering a credit card number, and it showing up at your door a few days later was pretty cool, and I can distinctively remember the first Christmas where I did all of my shopping online and then bragged about not having to go to the mall. A pretty glorious experience for somebody who never really liked the mall.

    Mail order systems existed but you had to call to place your order on the phone (during business hours), or physically mail your order slip with a handwritten credit card number or a check.

    I think one of the most fascinating components of this that struck people was how fast you could communicate with people on the other side of the earth. A lot of people would exclaim “I just talked to a guy in Australia!” as the most eye-opening first experience. That’s a real tell on how isolated we used to be.

    In the early '90s, there was a very real sense that most people around you had not ever been online before. So if you started talking about your experiences most people would look at you like you’re an alien, or at least some kind of super nerd. There was a period of time where it was decidedly uncool.

    My best friend to this day is a guy I met in middle school and we quickly discovered that we both knew about BBS systems. By the time I graduated there were maybe only four or five guys in our BBS group of friends at our high school of 600 people.

    Anyways, sorry for the essay. Having been born into the analog era and grown up as it became digital was a wild experience that those before and those after might not totally relate to.

    • @connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      I’m old enough to have experienced some of the analog days, but we were too rural and poor for me to participate online.

      I read an article in some magazine back in the day where the author talked about using email, and it did sound so amazing. And then when I eventually had internet access, yeah, when I traded emails with someone in Italy, mind-blowing. I thought the internet would make everyone outgrow small-mindedness!

      I suspect cloud storage would have sounded old-fashioned and “mainframe” at the time.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      At that time, you have to remember there was no other way to access those services in real time.

      Laughs in Ceefax

      • @nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Impressive, I don’t think I’d heard of Ceefax. It seems like it was broadcast and then recorded, and then this set top box knew how to interpret and parse the data into this format.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 months ago

          Basically in CRT screens, the arm that zapped the glass of the screen needed to stop zapping the screen and return to the top again. So there was a gap in the broadcast to let this happen. Some engineers saw this gap and decided to put data in there. Originally for subtitles, but they realised they can make an entire news service with it.

    • SolidGrue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      The SMS network ran on FIDONet for a good long while. It might still do, for all I know

  • mozz
    link
    fedilink
    147 months ago

    I used Usenet and anonymous FTP, archie and gopher, in the days just before the creation of the web. I actually thought the web was weird when my ISP started trying to push it, and couldn’t really understand why they were making such a big deal about it and taking so much trouble to explain to me all the things I’d have to do to get hooked up with it (which were significant). It seemed like just a bunch of weird-looking pages and not all that useful. Weird bomb-making recipes in text files from anonymous FTP seemed a lot better.

    CompuServe had a very different feel as opposed to the community-run places like FidoNet and Usenet. It always sort of felt like a Dollar General version of the internet, where all the shelves are a little disordered and no one’s really paying that much attention to what’s going on. Usenet and FTP were very cool. There was wild stuff on there.

    Getting access to email was very cool. Before that it was sending letters, or talking on the phone with family members or random strangers walking around hearing you. Getting a physical letter from someone you were distantly-connected to was very cool in a way that’s not replicated on any electronic network, and email seemed initially like it was better, although I think now that in letters we lost something important.

    Probably the most massive difference between now and those days is something I don’t see people talk about very much: Before the internet, there really was only 1 viewpoint and 1 viewpoint only on the news. US soldiers were the good guys. Neoliberals in government are looking out for you. Criminals are bad. It’s just… it’s hard to explain, because now there’s such a wealth of different opinions and ways of looking at things that it seems normal, but back then it was very rare to get your hands on even one little piece of “subversive” viewpoint. When the Rodney King beating made the news, it was really electrifyingly shocking; at least to the white world, the idea that the cops would ever do something wrong or could even be charged with a crime was aberrant and confusing. They found the cops not guilty in the first trial. It was just too much to take on, to change the jury’s world view around to that they might have done something illegal, even with the whole thing on video.

    I got an issue of Adbusters and it was like this wild precious thing, an artifact from some other world. I was visiting somewhere when I found it; it wasn’t available in my hometown. On the early internet, I was reading a message board where some people were talking about tactics fighting against NATO troops, and it was fucking mind blowing. Like… they’re the enemy. How can they be allowed on the internet? Like people? And then I started downloading episodes of “Off the Hook” and issues of 2600, and it sort of was this gateway into this whole other way of looking at the world. I read some Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn, and around that time this whole other type of media came along, and in about 5-10 years it became, silently but inexorably, an acceptable thing. But when I was growing up, it wasn’t.

    It’s not gonna be possible, I think, for someone from today to really understand how blinkered the view was of the world for 99% of people, before the internet came along. I don’t know how well it will translate to today, but I remember Spin as another big watershed at the time, in showing me how much fakeness was in a lot of what I thought was real.

    • kersploosh
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Before the internet, there really was only 1 viewpoint and 1 viewpoint only on the news.

      Absolutely, though it went beyond the news. Culture in general was much more monolithic. You could start a conversation with any random person about the previous evening’s episode of Gunsmoke or MASH or Cheers and there was a very good chance they had watched it. It’s hard to overstate how much more diverse culture has become in the Internet era, for better and for worse.

      • MrsDoyle
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        Culture in general was much more monolithic

        That’s interesting - I didn’t experience the advent of the internet like that, probably because I’m from a fairly multicultural background and travelled at lot at that time. I lived near DC for a few months in 1976 and went on a three-week road trip around California in 1990 and did notice how isolated from the rest of the world Americans in general seemed, especially outside the big cities. I was a real novelty, exotic even, and I’m a white cis het woman. Just with a funny accent, from a country they’d never heard of.

        • @connect@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          I grew up in the rural US, and my family was acquainted with a family who lived in a neighboring state and had a summer home nearby.

          They were so exotic, yes. Just looking at a car with a plate from a different state was a novelty. I wish I’d been bold enough to talk with them myself, but then again my mother probably would have discouraged it.

          When I was first working, my officemate was from that state, and I was kind of impressed that he’d made the globe-trotting jet-setting move of coming to a whole other state. (No, I’d never been to another state myself at the time.)

    • @connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      Even though I was too poor and rural for internet services, I am old enough to remember the analog days, and this is very interesting what you’re saying about the narrow perspective and then broadening it.

      Like I remember the nightly national news on television and accepting it in the way of a kid who’s bright but hasn’t seen anything of the world very far from his house. Maybe the wider world seemed like something that happened only on television. Whatever Tom Brokaw said seemed like probably what was happening out there.

      But I think I would have expected at least a Southern cop to fuck anyone over whom he didn’t know, and we knew that cops liked to sit at the bottom of a hill with an unexpected speed limit and ticket the public all day.

      I can remember being a little bit aware of adbusters in the late 90s (IIRC, they were trying to sell something called black spot sneakers, and I kind of suspected they were just being like any company except with different rhetoric), can remember seeing that there was some company called Loompanics (I think) that sold every kind of crazy book. I knew that alt.2600 existed, but I didn’t really understand it.

      But, beyond that, I don’t think I recall the broadening as clearly as you do. There was probably a good bit of waking up that I didn’t do until the 2000 election happened, saw how the people around me regarded it, etc.

      I’ve never heard of Spin! I’ll watch it now.

  • kersploosh
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    In the '90s I occasionally dialed into a local BBS. Simple as it was, it felt like a glimpse of the future. Universities and businesses had network connections, even if it was only a LAN, but home computers at that point were typically standalone devices that you used by yourself. The idea of interacting with other far-away people from my house was so incredibly cool.

    • @Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      How did BBS work? I think you had to dial their number directly like calling someone on the phone, right? How did you find BBS’s? Did you just have to know people who ran them or what? Was there a search engine or directory of BBS?

      • kersploosh
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        Yep, I dialed directly into a modem on the far end and used a terminal emulator to navigate the service. A local office supply store had a cork board by the door where people could post events or sell used stuff, and a few BBSs had their info posted there.

        The BBS I used actually partnered with the office supply store to sell credits. I would go to the customer service counter and buy a piece of paper with an access code that I could then redeem for hours on the server. That’s how the BBS paid for their hardware and phone lines.

      • @rezifon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        BBS lists were published in computer magazines and on other BBS systems in the same area code, generally. Once you found one you quickly found links to others in your area.

        Some guy in your city would just leave his computer on all day and you could call it over a regular phone line with your modem. Only one person at a time could connect and if someone else was on that board you just got a busy signal.

        Terminal software and later modems themselves had “autodial” features that would keep trying to call until they eventually connected, so if you wanted to call a specific board you’d just wait while your computer dialed and hung up and dialed and hung up over and over again until it heard a modem on the other end. It was a huge technical innovation when US Robotics invented a modem that could detect the busy signal, allowing it to try the next attempt much sooner. Earlier modems just waited 30 seconds for either a connection or nothing and timed out before trying again.

        In the late 80s BBS software started supporting interconnections where you could call your local BBS and send an email to a user on a completely different BBS, even in a different city. This could take multiple days to send and then more days again for any potential reply. It felt like Star Trek at the time.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I first got online with CompuServe when I was just 7 (first online in 1992, just 1 year after the start of the World Wide Web going public) I was a weird kid that loved reading, and I had been reading my parents encyclopedia Britannica collection and found the entry for “the internet” and was instantly enamored with the idea and begged my dad to get it. I spent a lot of time in chat rooms, but I also played the Neverwinter Nights MUD.

    It was great, to me being a kid. I’m sure it wasn’t so great for my dad who had to pay for it. That shit was expensive back in the day! You had to pay the subscription itself and per minute on the phone, and the NWN game was a separate subscription! I was fucking spoiled when I look back at what I had and how much my parents had to have been paying for it all. 😭

    I am still very much in love with the internet. Especially when it comes to chatting and gaming 😎

  • nocturne
    link
    fedilink
    97 months ago

    Starting when I was in 7th or 8th grade (late 80s - early 90s) I started playing on MUDs (Multi User Dungeons), a precursor to an MMORPG that was all text based. It was part game, part chat room. It was not until a couple years later that I played regularly. They were not really an online service, but I did use aol as my isp starting in 96, but only to connect to a MUD or EverQuest.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Same. Before surfing the web, I was playing MUDs… and for a long time afterwards. I love 'em.

      • nocturne
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        I remember being at the computer center at the local university and someone came running in freaking out about the World Wide Web and then we had to figure out what a browser was and how to work it.

    • I absolutely loved MUDs.

      The one I remember playing, there were six other players all killing the same set of rat spawns. The game would only generate a handful every few minutes, and if you didn’t damage it, you didn’t get any experience. So id sit there waiting for my chance.

      I also remember a Discworld MUD!

  • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    97 months ago

    Yes it was fascinating.

    i want to point out those things weren’t before internet; they were before the world wide web

    • @connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      Thank you, that was careless of me. I intended to refer to before dial-up internet came along for ordinary people.

  • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 months ago

    It was expensive so you watched your time like a hawk on the paid services. Played games a little time in chat rooms.

    Spent a fair amount of time on BBSs, some had turn based games where you would log in every day to use your turns. Or pirated games, sometimes you would pay to download or you had to maintain a positive upload/download ratio (much like torrents)…

  • Rhaedas
    link
    fedilink
    87 months ago

    Don’t see mention of Q-Link (a C-64 specific large scale discussion service) much anymore, so had to comment. It was cutting edge to be part of something like that, and yes, it could be expensive - 5 cents a minute for some functions which could add up since it was all dialup. Anyone now looking back would see it as crude and basic, but it was a huge step up from the local BBSes. Chat rooms for all sorts of things, real time direct messaging with friends you made online, even file transfers while you chatted. Later years even played with 2d avatars that could walk around from place to place. Only years later after being an AOL user did I learn than a lot of AOL’s infrastructure was built upon the old Q-Link system.

    As a a side note, it was mind blowing to be exploring the deeper parts of AOL and find the the door to the REAL internet. AOL wanted users to stay within AOL for all their needs and not as a portal to everything else.

  • @Gimpydude@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    I first went online with CompuServe. I didn’t use a computer, I had a teletype connected to a 300 baud modem & an acoustic coupler. Back then, AT&T didn’t let you connect directly to the phone system. A year later, the vic-20 came out and I used that.

  • @rezifon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    77 months ago

    I just went through a house move and unearthed a spiral-bound CompuServe user’s manual from 1985. I have hand-written notes on the inside cover with the billing rates around that time. Cost was broken down in two tiers, prime time and after hours and then further by the speed you connected.

    300 baud cost $12.50/hour in prime time and $6/hour in the evenings. 1200 baud cost $15 and $12.50. 2400 baud cost $22.50 and $19. Minimum wage at the time was $3.35/hour. Inflation-adjusted that’s $55/hour for a 2400 baud prime time connection.

    2400 baud modems were brand new in '85 and it would still be a few years before they were widely used. I’d been running a BBS since '82 so I always wanted to be ahead of the curve for speed and compatibility.

    This was sort of the beginning of the end for CompuServe’s real success. 1985 was also when local BBSs started to figure out how to federate and link up. FidoNet was really starting to take off and if you were a CS Major you probably had access to the proto-internet in the computer lab on campus at your college. It wouldn’t be until 1990 before the first search engine existed, though.

    I took a bunch of terrible photos of the book but then found that Internet Archive has the whole thing scanned in great quality.

    Here’s some photos of the book I have here because the artifact is kinda cool just itself: https://imgur.com/a/XQWi9cK

    Here’s the scan: https://archive.org/details/compu-serve-information-service-users-guide/mode/2up

    That first photo on Imgur of the book’s cover is 3.1mb. It would take 174 minutes to download that file at 300 baud. A blistering 21 minutes at 2400 baud. It would require 3 floppy disks to store it.

    The text of this Lemmy post? 1,884 bytes which would take 6.3 seconds to send at 300 baud.

      • @rezifon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        21 minutes was the transfer time at 2400 baud but you used the 300 baud price. $7.88 to see it at $22.50/hour.

        $36.25 to see it at 300 baud (174 minutes at $12.50/hour)

  • @CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    67 months ago

    I actually met my second husband on CompuServe. We both were members of the Adventure game forum and knew each other by name from there.

    A few years later, a friend of mine had a birthday party on ICQ for my (now) husband when I was separated and here we are 24 years later.

    CompuServe is where I got to get my adventure and crpg fix

  • @cmeu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    57 months ago

    I remember it being pretty incredible that there were other users out there I could talk to. I had heard about email and I got an address! I didn’t know anyone to email, but I had an address! Chat was amazing. BBS systems offered text games, like LORD - which also took things to a new level. Participation in discussion forums on BBSes and AOL led me to forums on the Web. At school we used to use gopher but the www was more fun (if you could see past the construction sign graphics) and you could always see the hit counters and guestbook links on most pages. Then the construction signs got more sophisticated and animated😀 The early-mid-90s Internet was glorious. Google showed up after Yahoo was too littered with ads… Some guys in college made a search engine that prioritized speed - dreadfully important at analog speeds…

  • kbin_space_program
    link
    fedilink
    57 months ago

    I am old enough to recall pre internet. Even had a few physical letter pen pals.

    Email was mind blowing.

    Hell, even just the concept of digital encyclopedia, not even on the internet, was game changing.

    I miss dialing 0 and instantly getting a real person to help you though.

    • @connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      I do remember the pre-internet days, but we were too poor and rural for me to buy a modem and dial into anything.

      I always kind of wished I had a pen pal back then. I was so lonely. I was looking for clips from Big Blue Marble a while back (a children’s television show I just barely remembered seeing once or twice), and there was something about pen pals being part of the show, and it made me feel all over again like oh if I’d had a pen pal back then! Although my life was so dull I might have struggled with what to write about.

      I read an article in some magazine where the author talked about using email, and it did sound just mind-blowing to have a larger world than your mother and your father and the television.