• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    964 months ago

    I fucking hate motion-sensing faucets so much. We can edit the human genome, but are unable to make a motion sensor that actually fucking works?! Fuck outta here.

    I actually prefer the old-school “push-down and have limited time” type at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      914 months ago

      I just want a foot pedal to press. Public toilets should also have those just for hygienic reasons.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        144 months ago

        I’m not sure if this is ADA compliant. It might be the reason why we don’t see these very often. I had one of these at work though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          84 months ago

          I can only see wheelchairs being an issue, but you need special toilets and sinks for that anyway. Any foot pedal should be able to be activated with a crutch or prosthetic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          ADA compliancy is such a BS hurdle sometimes.

          “Hey we made this improvement that will help 99.99% of all people!”

          “What about the remaining 0.01%?”

          “Well, no, unfortunately it won’t work for those edge cases”

          “Ewww… Well it’s not allowed then. If a blind man in a wheelchair with a service dog can’t use it, then no one can!”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          I think typically they only turn on when they actively detect something near the sensor. Once they no longer detect the object, they shut off.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I don’t think so.

            If they only relied on the sensor it would constantly turn on and off which is something I have never seen on that kind of faucets. I think there is always a delay before shutting down but sometimes that delay is set so low that it feels like you need to constantly activate the sensor.

            Edit: clarification: What I meant is that if you just move once your hand in front of the sensor it should remain ON longer than just the time your hand was detected. I have never seen a sensor that literally activates only to the millisecond when something is moving. Even just to prevent false activation for half a second you kind of need a delay in there. If not you could have a 100ms activation that doesn’t even have the time to let the water out by opening the faucet and you create unnecessary wear on the valve system. My point being it never really makes sense in engineering to have a button or sensor direct output used. Usually you have mechanisms to prevent “bouncing” and so on. But I’m no plumber so it is just assumptions.

          • LazaroFilmOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            That’s how this one works. If I stop rubbing my hands the water stops. It detects motion, not proximity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      You have correctly identified that it’s not a lack of technological advancement that is holding our society back.

      Now go solve social sciences, economics, psychology, and neuroscience. Come back and we’ll talk about how to design a world where nobody happens to install a motion sensor with a wrong range.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      I’ve actually encountered a properly designed one once in my life. The sensor was in the faucet spout instead of in the base.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    564 months ago

    This and most washroom faucets have too little space for washing hands. The space from the spout to the back and bottom of the sink doesn’t allow for rinsing whilst scrubbing without touching the sink. Infuriating.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      They’re not actually intended for washing your hands but rather for ticking the ‘customer hand-washing facility available’ box and providing jobs for interior designers nephews.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        164 months ago

        Okay, you tell me how to wash my hands…

        I wet my hands, get soap, scrub, and continue to scrub as I rinse. Not going to stand there for 2 minutes for all the soap to rinse off on its own. Your way is actually worse because you end up having to maneuver your hands a lot more to get all the soap off to the wrists. And good luck trying to wash your forearms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -34 months ago

          It shouldn’t take 2 minutes to rinse soap off of your hands. It takes me like 5 second.

          How much soap are you using?

  • ares35
    link
    fedilink
    194 months ago

    at the office we have the ones you have to push down–and hold for the water to run. i’ve encountered them elsewhere and you get 10-20 seconds before the water shuts off… ours doesn’t. by the time you get your hand down to the water, it’s shut off.

    • wazzupdog (they/them)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      We had “sink bricks” to solve that problem, somebody was tired of those so they went to the hardware store and bought a couple bricks to hold the buttons down. Eventually the faucets were replaced with proper ones with normal valves.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    164 months ago

    LPT: For faucets like this (or if you just want running water to wash something) get a paper towel. Wet it under the water and then put it over the sensor.

    Toilet paper also works but it’s messier.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    104 months ago

    I have seen something like this a lot. Many more that work fine but but they certainly don’t seem to be at the five 9’s or two nines or maybe even one nine. maybe one nine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      five 9’s or two nines or maybe even one nine. maybe one nine.

      This is the first time I hear this expression, what does it mean?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        174 months ago

        “Five Nines” typically refers to something that works 99.999% of the time, which still allows for 1 screw-up out of 100,000.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            I learned it working telecom. For example, if you wish to offer 911 service, your service has to be operational 99.999% of the time.

            It’s more casually used to mean a service or operation is insanely reliable.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        yes as dhork mentions its related to a concept of 6sigma which is an airline/telephony thing about things that must not fail. My little quip is suggesting they work like 90% of the time which is not great.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Finally learned what DFSS actually means rather than just a breakdown pf the fucking acronym lol

  • HEXN3T
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    This automatic faucet that need the hands to be between the wall and the water to turn on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    Is this at a hotel? Just hang a “do not disturb” tag on the pipe to keep the water running!