• RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6214 hours ago

    Just make carrier locking illegal and have customers pay the actual price, now it’s just hidden costs to the consumer.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 hours ago

      It isn’t been a hidden cost for a while. Phone companies sell the phones at full price, but consumers want the 2 year 0% APR financing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 hours ago

        If consumers bought the phones from a third party, there’d be absolutely no reason to lock the phone to a carrier. But when carriers also provide the financing, there’s an incentive to keep them on the service until the bill is paid. Screw that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            Until you realize that things like wifi calling have to be an at&t phone. Unless they’ve changed this in the last few years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 hours ago

            Then don’t buy a $1k device, and instead buy something you can afford?

            Otherwise, there are tons of buy now, pay later services, so you could just use any of those.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              55 hours ago

              Not go into debt to upgrade something that actually in most cases doesn’t need upgrading. What a amazing thought.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Yup. I upgraded my phone because it ran out of software updates (had for >3 years). My new phone cost <$400 and has >5 years of software support, if the hardware lasts that long. A $1k device is not necessary and is a luxury item, and you shouldn’t go into debt for luxuries…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  34 hours ago

                  Exactly. I started buying my phones at full price unlocked in 2016 when I switched to a mobile virtual network operator and I’ve never gone back to $1,000 phones because losing $1,000 from your Monero wallet hurts bad.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 hours ago

                    I’ve been doing the same. It makes traveling easier too. It costs way less to get a local sim for an unlocked phone you own than to pay the carrier to allow you to use a locked phone overseas.

                    At home, MVNOs, for me, were basically what the rest of the world had. The big carriers kept pushing phones, the MVNOs were simpler, quicker, and less scammy. Eventually I found a non-MVNO T-Mobile prepaid plan that gave me unlimited SMS, 100min. Talk, and 5-6GB data (which they deceptively call unlimited 👎, but was more than enough for me)

                    The site run by the greedy little pigboy used to have a “nocontract” community for discussing the best plans, they had a big google sheet and lots of research, but it seems someone infiltrated it because they no longer list the best deals.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 hours ago

            There are tons of buy now, pay later services, and they make money through revenue sharing w/ the retailer, as well as when people fail to pay back the loan on time.

            But ideally, this would just put downward pressure on phone prices as people look to buy phones w/ cash instead of going into debt.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 hours ago

                Honestly any moderately expensive item can be purchased through installments. Go to any electronics store and they’ll have offers like that, and they use different services to provide that financing.

                It’s a non-issue, carriers don’t need to be a party to that at all. I can literally go to BestBuy or Apple and get 0% financing on a new phone and take it to any carrier I want.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 hours ago

                  You know what you’re talking about. It’s nice to see that.

                  But if carriers didn’t have phones for sale everyone would be mad about it. They might have even been mad in the beginning, so the carriers started selling phones too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 hours ago

      You’re going off of phone contracts that haven’t been around for a decade. The cost of the phone up front, and has been for a long time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          They lock it so you’ll pay for the phone. That’s the only reason.
          Should requiring people to pay for things be illegal?

          Frankly you’re being ignorant, and expect to somehow get a thousand dollar device for free. That’s not how the world works.

          • RubberDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 hours ago

            Wha? The guy I responded to said the customers now pay full price up front. If a device is bought it should be unlocked.

            Additionally giving away a phone for a determined time contract means that the company is technically giving you a loan and it should be on your credit record, require the company to do a proper credit check and be allowed to give out loans.

            Bottom line, it’s predatory and should not be allowed. Noone is advocating giving 1000 dollar phones for free… it was a strawman you stuck me with… but I don’t want it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Wha? The guy I responded to said the customers now pay full price up front.

              No. I never said that. I said the cost of the phone is upfront. There are no 2 year contracts anymore, and haven’t been for at least a decade. You see the full price of the phone, and decide how much a month you want to spend to pay it off.

              If a device is bought it should be unlocked.

              I agree with you. And that’s how it works. The question is how long after paying off the phone should it be locked.

              Additionally giving away a phone for a determined time contract …

              Again, they haven’t offered contracts like that in ten years. But yes you do need to pass a credit check to have a phone financed.

              Bottom line, it’s predatory and should not be allowed.

              What exactly should not be allowed?

              • RubberDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 hours ago

                OK so you buy the phone on a payment plan… and credit check. Then once it’s paid off it should be unlocked.