@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 21 hours agoSteam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square220arrow-up1734arrow-down132cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1702arrow-down1external-linkSteam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'www.pcgamer.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 21 hours agomessage-square220cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-6•3 hours agoG*mers really don’t want the industry to evaluate the $60 price point and apply inflationary adjustments going back to when it became the standard.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•3 hours agoThe $60 was based on 55%+ going to distribution channels, +physical media costs, so it could be down from there.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 hours agoFr tho people seem to forget abt inflation a lot when talking abt the old days
minus-squareCorganalinkfedilinkEnglish1•46 minutes agoThis is a really interesting chart. A lot of N64 games were $70 and even $80 at launch which is upwards of $150 today. Just crazy.
G*mers really don’t want the industry to evaluate the $60 price point and apply inflationary adjustments going back to when it became the standard.
The $60 was based on 55%+ going to distribution channels, +physical media costs, so it could be down from there.
Fr tho people seem to forget abt inflation a lot when talking abt the old days
This is a really interesting chart. A lot of N64 games were $70 and even $80 at launch which is upwards of $150 today. Just crazy.