• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 day ago

      Technically you’re not wrong. Mainly because there’s no agreed upon technical definition of what does or doesn’t constitute a tree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        620 hours ago

        the definition of tree is literally just something that looks like a tree: a woody trunk with branches.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          TIL that trees are the same as vegetables and weeds, arbitrary cultural groupings. We should make an arbitrary cultural group name for arbitrary cultural grouped things!

          So far the group is: -Trees -Vegetables -Weeds -Pets -Continents -The culinary use of fruit

          • flicker
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1222 hours ago

            You can make toothpicks out of anything if you’re willing to find a hard bit in it that can be sharpened or whittled.

            Holds up a chicken. Behold! A tree!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            219 hours ago

            Nope, that’s not how the definition of a tree works. Look at swednek’s definition in the comments: it is a woody trunk with branches. There are many other plants you could make toothpicks out of (e.g. that are woody) that aren’t trees. For example, shrubs and lianas.