Maven (famous) to Science [email protected]English • 12 hours agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square92arrow-up1826arrow-down124
arrow-up1802arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous) to Science [email protected]English • 12 hours agomessage-square92
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•5 hours agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•5 hours agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•4 hours agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 hours agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 hours agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
I hope for you that you’re high.