@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agouhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"?message-square205arrow-up1176arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1173arrow-down1message-squareuhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"?@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square205file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoAgree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoI don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoIts not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard
Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
I don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
Its not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard