• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2221 day ago

    Fuckin space garbage is what it is.

    Yes it was impressive that they landed a rocket again once, but the quantity of launches and satellites is doing nothing good for anyone. It should’ve been a stepping stone for better technology, but instead they’re just mining money. Privately owned space engineering is a disgrace to humanity.

    Space engineering used to unite even the worst opponents as with the international space station, but now those institutions are underfunded, while billionaire space-musk can shoot his loads into the atmosphere without any regard to the rest of the worlds population living inside said sphere.

    Tax the asshole already.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 hours ago

      agreed. it’s a technology we need but like everything meant to improve humanity, it should be publicly owned (no, not the stock market - truly public).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      541 day ago

      I was excited about starlink when it was announced, but already it’s way too expensive, already bows to actual totalitarians and isn’t affordable on the ocean and not available in remote places without a license.

      And with more satellite constellations planned by amazon and others, it seems the kessler syndrome is just a question of time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 hours ago

        It’s extremely affordable on the ocean. What are you talking about?

        Just until recently satellite internet was really expensive. Like only large corporations could afford it. And the bandwidth was shit. Also it was barely available in the deep northern and southern hemisphere. Sure it’s considered expensive for the regular kayaking dude. But it’s insanely more available than ever before.

        The dudes an asshole. But don’t invent arguments.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          Yeah it’s much cheaper, but still like $250 excessively expensive compared to $50 land based starlink. For no technical reason since there is vastly less utilization on ocean. It’s price gauging because of lack of alternative and because rich cruisers can afford it. So poor people are still forced to use cell phone based internet (or starlink) only near the coast and nothing has changed. For me it’s a disappointment. Of course that is just capitalism.

          Theoretically the sea could be one of the cheapest places to live if you build and maintain your own solar powered electric boat. Or use kite power. No taxes, produce your own electricity, produce your own water, incinerating toilet and emit only grey water. The one thing that is missing is cheap internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1419 hours ago

        On the Kessler point, Starlink birds fly at an altitude where they will deorbit in 4-8 years if they go dead, so that particular orbit will always be fairly clean, and if a Kessler event does happen, the debris will deorbit in a reasonable length of time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1022 hours ago

          Turkey and Russia. It’s clear that profit seeking corporations would bow, but then Elon screams bloody murder when reactionary forces in Brazil manipulating social media get censored.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              721 hours ago

              To bow, or bow down or kneel for. But I’m not going to google that for you haha. The basic problem is that starlink theoretically has immense power so it becomes a political tool. He bows to those ones but not to legitimate democratic interests.

              Especially once starlink and others can make landline based internet connections obsolete by pricing them out - which they are not currently doing though, but it seems only a matter of time with competition. Basically we could get to a situation where there are only like 2 or 3 internet provider practically controlling internet globally.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 hours ago

                When I searched “Elon bows to Turkey” I got this story about Twitter censoring some tweets during the Turkish election… Is that what you’re talking about?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                321 hours ago

                They won’t be able to price landline based connections out as long as they have to replace their satellites every 5 years. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re running at a loss currently.

      • Final Remix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 day ago

        It happens really early with that fuckin’ weasel in charge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -123 hours ago

      the quantity of launches and satellites is doing nothing good for anyone

      Except for the millions of people accessing internet via Starlink to whom the alternative is either no internet, slow internet or extremely expensive internet.