@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 days agounwatchable!!mander.xyzimagemessage-square106arrow-up11.09Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imageunwatchable!!mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 days agomessage-square106
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 days agoThe implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive. I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 days agoI think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other
The implication is that the original wasn’t cohesive.
I think the real world sections of the original are perfectly cohesive.
I think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other