good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mandatory voting, for people who have passed a morality test, and a competency test.

    Nobody else is allowed to vote.

    • alyaza [they/she]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      132 months ago

      for people who have passed a morality test

      i don’t see how this is even theoretically tenable considering what is “moral” is entirely subjective and largely nonfalsifiable

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago

      You really don’t want tests to prevent voting. They will be used entirely for voter supression.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Yeah because there’s definitely no voter suppression going on already. Let’s make sure the dregs of society can share their dumbass opinions when things come to a general vote.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          That’s a false equivalence. Building up society as a whole is better than trying to determine “the most relevant” voices.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          I suspect the people who would set this test would be the exact opposite of the people you want to set this test, in more than 50% of the seats.