Roflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy [email protected] • 17 days agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square457arrow-up1591arrow-down1101
arrow-up1490arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy [email protected] • 17 days agomessage-square457
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•17 days agoWithout reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•17 days agowhich seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•17 days agoMaybe to you… To me it seems like you’re trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•17 days agowe haven’t said anything about my diet. i’m talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•17 days agoNo you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•17 days ago you seemed to be saying i never made this about myself at all. i’d prefer if you didn’t make tihs personal.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•17 days agoI’m not trying to make this about you, i’m just trying to respond to what I think you’re trying to argue that you didn’t explicitly say
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•17 days ago I’m not trying to make this about you, then kindly leave me out of your analysis.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•17 days agoHow can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You’re just being ridiculous now.
Without reading the paper you could interpret from it anything you wanted, I suppose.
which seems to be the goal of both beaver and the editorial staff who posted the fluff piece that beaver linked.
Maybe to you… To me it seems like you’re trying to post-rationalize your choice to eat meat and not a vegan diet
we haven’t said anything about my diet. i’m talking purely about the merits of the paper raised in this context.
No you were talking about what OP seemed to be saying, and I was talking about what you seemed to be saying
i never made this about myself at all. i’d prefer if you didn’t make tihs personal.
I’m not trying to make this about you, i’m just trying to respond to what I think you’re trying to argue that you didn’t explicitly say
then kindly leave me out of your analysis.
How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You’re just being ridiculous now.