• @Forester
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    In my personal opinion, the core defining trait that makes someone libertarian is adherence to the non aggression policy. If they are capable of that then they are libertarian in my book. Even if I disagree on other aspects of their ideology.

      • @Forester
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        I don’t understand where you’re getting a debate from. It’s pretty easy to summarize as. Don’t shit in the Common well don’t pollute the common air. Don’t trespass on your neighbor’s property. Don’t touch your neighbor’s things. Never resort to violence unless for self-defense.

          • @Forester
            link
            fedilink
            216 days ago

            That’s an opinion. I don’t know where you found it but it’s an opinion.

              • @Forester
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                I’m a capitalist sweetie

                I believe in minarchism and capitalism

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  115 days ago

                  Seriously bro, look up the history of libertarianism! Even if it doesn’t change your mind about anything, it’s useful to understand the context.

                  “One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, ‘our side,’ had captured a crucial word from the enemy . . . ‘Libertarians’ . . . had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over…”

                  — Murray N. Rothbard, The Betrayal Of The American Right

                  • @Forester
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    15 days ago

                    I would advise you to go further back and read Locke and Thoreau

                    Capitalist minarchism is a branch of Lockeism

                    The theory is rooted in laws of nature that Locke identifies, which permit individuals to appropriate, and exercise control rights over, things in the world, like land and other material resources. In other words, Locke’s theory is a justificatory account about the legitimacy of private property rights.

                    However, I am partial to several of thoreau’s Geoism points