@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoRulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square115arrow-up11.14Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageRulefiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square115
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•edit-22 months agoWell it’s certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink15•2 months agoJust FYI, the phrase is “per se”, not “per say”. It’s Latin for “by itself”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 months agoJust FYI, Not according to my android keyboard’s autocorrect.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilink4•2 months agoMaybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn’t suggest either option.
Well it’s certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.
Just FYI, the phrase is “per se”, not “per say”. It’s Latin for “by itself”.
Just FYI, Not according to my android keyboard’s autocorrect.
Maybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn’t suggest either option.