American gen Z voters share how they feel about Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, why they like or dislike her as a candidate and whether they think she could beat Donald Trump, as the vice-president races towards winning the Democratic nomination for November’s election.

‘I think she’s just what we need’

“I think [Kamala Harris] is the only one that makes sense. She will get the votes Biden couldn’t. She could get the Black, Asian, Latino, women’s, LGBTQ+ and youth votes. She stands more for progress and equality than an old white dude and if she wins it will be historic. The Democrats need a bold move and I think she’s just what we need.

“I hope the Democrats realize what an opportunity this is for them.” Will, 22, construction worker from Portland, Oregon

  • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2254 months ago

    Good to hear, but if you weren’t voting to oppose obvious fascism before, you’re not a very good/informed citizen.

    • @djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      1324 months ago

      Most Americans aren’t good citizens, so if you actually want to beat fascism, being able to win over disconnected voters is a huge deal.

    • @Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      42
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, most people are not informed. But they sit back and watch an old, crooked, politician call another dude an old, crooked, politician. It was a joke. And while us nerds sitting here in a political sub can say that’s dumb, even though we know Biden wasn’t ideal hes better than the other option, the truth is most people were just sitting back and laughing at how ridiculous the situation was.

      I hope everyone gets that. I have voted every election for the last 20 years but I was struggling to get myself to vote for a guy that couldn’t even talk. I was pretty pissed off at the DNC for trying so hard to hide his medical problems and just say “Well, at least he’s not Trump! If you don’t vote you’re a fascist!” ". Taking action to correct it gets rid of that bitter taste in my mouth and I am sure it does for a LOT of people that were NEVER going to vote. While Kamala doesn’t inspire huge waves of grassroots support, at least she isn’t embarrassing and she returns legitimacy to the office.

        • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          264 months ago

          Recent events indicate that “better candidates” is the answer to your question.

          Like progressives have been saying for years.

        • @jpreston2005@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          People want to vote FOR something, not against something. We want hope for a better future.

          Just look at how popular Bernie Sanders and his policy proposals are. People were excited to vote for him, because he was proposing to actually help the average American.

        • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          It’s a question of priorities… is it more important to be right or to defeat fascism - if the later is your priority then shaming people for still being wrong makes the fascism more likely.

      • @suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -114 months ago

        I mean most people shouldn’t be allowed to vote, like MAGA and people who planned to not vote against a fascist.

    • @Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      Yeah really like who are these people who weren’t going to vote for Joe? Are they stupid?

      • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        584 months ago

        uninformed/misguided apathetic “i don’t care about politics” kids who saw nothing but ancient white men and can’t/won’t distinguish between them

        • AmidFuror
          link
          fedilink
          -144 months ago

          And then vote because of gender and race and not politics.

          • @lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            It’s another reason Harris would be crazy to go with anyone but Mark Kelly. You’ll get people who never dreamed of voting to just vote for the novelty of an astronaut and fighter pilot.

              • @lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                44 months ago

                I love Beau of the Fifth Column, but I have to politely disagree with him here. I’m originally from rural Appalachia and I don’t think you try to combat Vance by one-upping him with someone from that region. To me he makes less of a case for Beshear in this video and just more explains why JD Vance is a terrible pick, which I agree. Recognizing that much of the Presidential election ultimately comes down to a popularity contest, I think you go with the more flashy figure. For instance, I’m a pretty big political junkie and even I don’t know much about Beshear. That’s not to say he won’t skyrocket in name-recognition if the announcement comes that he’s her pick, but it’s just an easier sell to the average voter: “Wow, Mark Kelly is an astronaut and navy fighter pilot veteran!” The mere novelty of that will draw people to vote for him. I think this is powerful enough to draw those same voters away from Vance in itself.

                Having someone popular running as VP from a key battleground state is a plus, too. We have to realize that much of rust/bible-belt isn’t particularly in play anyway. We have Whitmer who will help carry Michigan; and we have Shapiro who will help carry Pennsylvania. Seems like Tony Evers is doing well in Wisconsin. These are the three key battleground states while the likes of AZ and NV and so forth are more secondary battleground states.

        • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 months ago

          I can be a bit of a pot stirrer now and then, but I feel compassion makes me happier. Few people wake with the intent to make bad decisions.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        26
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s because of those people that you now have another, better, more winnable option. You’re welcome.

        • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          On the other hand, if more people had turned out in 2016 we wouldn’t be here.

          Politics shouldn’t be a popularity contest.

          • @alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            274 months ago

            You could also say, if the Democrats had nominated a more likeable candidate in 2016, we wouldn’t be here.

            Clinton got less votes than Obama in 2012 and 2008, even though the population had grown during that time.

            And it wasn’t the Bernie bros who stayed home. Polling revealed that the Bernie bros showed up.

            Blaming the voters is like having your bakery go bankrupt and trying to blame people for not buying your shitty cake.

            First, bake a better cake.

            • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              What part of “I like soldiers who didn’t get captured” and “grab them by the pussy” confused voters?

              Count Dracula should have beaten Trump.

              I totally blame the voters.

              • @alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                34 months ago

                I know, but we were having a conversation about 2016 and the voters didn’t pick Clinton then.

                At least, not enough of them in certain swing states.

          • @zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            It also shouldn’t be a duopoly game but here we are.

            The shorter election cycle is appreciated. This should be a thing. Say, on July 5th of an election year, then it begins.

            • Keep the primary results a secret until a couple of weeks before the convention. It’d also help the states with late primaries to not feel irrelevant.

            • @Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              We’re celebrating the apparent increase in voters that aren’t even following the duopoly policies enough to recognize literal fascism vs imperfect but generally good faith politicians.

              If they’re not informed enough to see the face eating leopard party for what it is, adding more parties to the mix won’t improve anything.

              I agree that ranked choice voting is desirable. But it won’t help with these kinds of voters.

              • @zephorah@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                I don’t get that. I still have relatives trying to tell me trickle down economics works, that it is the way. Really? You think successful trickle down economics is why we all feel squeezed right now? You think that’s why Amazon workers go through hell while Bezos flies around in a penis rocket?

                Reality isn’t tracking as reality. I’m not sure how one gets to that point where a confident person in a suit announces that x is the truth and so you just start repeating x is the truth and actually believing it.

            • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

              People need to educate themselves. Look at how Jerry Falwell and his ‘Moral Majority’ took over the GOP. They had one simple trck; if the local Republican clubhouse got 20 people at the regular meeting Falwell’s folks would show up with fifty. They got the little jobs, like county clerk and sheriff, and then the bigger state positions and finally were in a position to control who got the white House.

              • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                04 months ago

                If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

                Please don’t gloat that the primaries have had a preordained winner for every presidential race since 2012. Particularly not when the most recent preordained winner had to step down, to the acclaim of the vast bulk of the party.

                • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  and BotH Sides aRe ThE SAme, right?

                  If you’re going to tell people not to vote, try coming up with an actual alternative action.

                  • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    14 months ago

                    I did not say that people should not vote, or that both sides are the same. You lost the argument and you’re strawmanning. The shitty preordained candidate you wanted stepped down. We have a better candidate now.

          • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            In a democracy. Politics is absolutely a popularity contest. The population votes. If you want better outcomes, do more for the population. When you don’t give the population what they want, you get totalitarianism which is the course we are on.

          • TimeSquirrel
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            He had a chance. He’s shaking in his shoes now because he knows she will wipe the goddamn floor with his shitty toupee/combover or whatever the hell that thing is. He thought he was going to have it easy against the old man. Now him and his whole party are fucked, scrambling to throw anything against the wall to see if it sticks, because they have nothing. Not even ancillary shit like Hunter’s laptop.

            Come sit down and watch, here’s some popcorn 🍿.