• @Jimbo
    link
    fedilink
    424 months ago

    the DEI candidate

    Non American here… Do I even want to know?

      • @Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        304 months ago

        Slight correction: it’s equity not equality.

        Equality is everyone being treated the same way regardless of differences.

        Equity is everyone being provided with the tools they need to succeed taking individual differences into account.

        This is the goal, whether or not it succeeds depends on how it’s implemented.

        • Zenabiz
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          Thanks for the correction. I’m also not American. Edited the post.

        • @Robaque@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Equality is everyone being treated the same way regardless of differences.

          Generally, equality is just about equality of freedom or “power to –”. If someone needs support to achieve their goals (as long as this doesn’t involve “power over” others / oppression) then of course it is important that there be societal structures/networks in place to help them, or at least “meta-structures” that can facilitate the organisation of such supporting networks.

          Of course, “freedom” is a poorly defined word in itself, but imo the “everyone treated the exact same” (or worse, “everyone should be the same”) interpretations are not in the spirit of “freedom” and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were constructed in bad faith (not to promote “equity” but to discredit “equality”).

          But ultimately it’s just semantics, and if you like calling it equity that’s cool, it’s just good to keep in mind that people who still use “equality” can easily be referring to the exact same thing.

          • @Glytch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            Yes they can be referring to the same thing, but the “E” in “DEI” stands for “equity”, not “equality”. I made no value judgments on either term, I just explained the difference.

        • @31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          Yep. There’s a whole propaganda industry that rails against it (Prager U, Daily Wire, Red pillers, etc), and right-wing states are banning Universities from engaging in it, and banning investment of state funds in companies that take DEI into account (even though it’s pretty much just corporate lip-service).

        • @boomzilla@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Bill Ackmann (a 9 bn dollar heavy reptiloid billionaire) posted a lengthy rant against it on that birdsite and our lord and saviour Elmo concurred and proclaimed that it’s racist, immoral and illegal although similar programs were already in place since 1964 in the USA.

          MAGAs regularly claim that it’s the fault of DEI when something goes south, e.g. Boeing machines failing, the CrowdStrike thingy, the bridge crash in Baltimore or Harris getting to the position she’s now in.

    • @ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      304 months ago

      The current far-right boogeyman.

      They use it to claim people that are not white, cishet, able-bodied, male, etc. are hired for their “diversity quota”, not their skills, while also appearing as reasonable to moderates. In my country (Hungary), similar backlashes were used to get minorities fired or not hired for some single minor mistake, and then hire a way worse non-minority. I was the victim of such thing, they asked my brother if I have “random violent meltdowns that end with destroyed equipment and bit co-workers”, when my brother said no, they decided to make me write on a table (which I suck at), where I was “too slow”, so they hired some more neurotypical guy, who had like almost zero programming knowledge, while I was described as “already having junior-level knowledge from open source projects”.

    • @StaySquared@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      She was brought on as a VP because of her minority status, rather than her experience. But then again apparently the Dems like people who are oppressors. Like what Kamala did to San Francisco citizens over marijuana cases.