@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 16 days agoBethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upsetwww.gamespot.comexternal-linkmessage-square169arrow-up1564arrow-down116cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1548arrow-down1external-linkBethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upsetwww.gamespot.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 16 days agomessage-square169cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•16 days agoNeither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn’t tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-215 days agobecause Fallout 3 is at least fallout-ish despite its horrible writing, story, and world building. 4 is just a shooter game with Vault Tec and Super mutants thrown into it.
Neither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn’t tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.
because Fallout 3 is at least fallout-ish despite its horrible writing, story, and world building.
4 is just a shooter game with Vault Tec and Super mutants thrown into it.