• 🐠 tiago🍍
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Out of 19 people elected, 6 mentioned moderation and/or trust & safety in their platform goals. 4 people mentioned ecosystem diversity. The remaining people mentioned a variety of goals.

    When I saw these results, I was was confused why some listed no pronouns at all. When I inquired about it, I was told that it was optional.

    Your concern about cisnormativity is totally valid, but I see little correlation with the mod tools? What improvements could be done on the technical side?

    ETA: thanks for sharing.

    • Lionir [he/him]OP
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      well the statistic you show does make it clear that little people expressed interest in moderation and/or trust & safety.

      As for how I relate cisnormativity and the demographics of the board, I feel that people who may have no experience with harassment may not prioritize the construction of moderation tools.

      On the technical side, I’ve expanded here in another comment here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not declaring pronouns doesn’t mean you’re cis. Could just be enby* and accepting of all pronouns

        • Lionir [he/him]OP
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          I’ve seen a lot of people specify (any) or a combination in those cases but it is theoretically true, yes. (I don’t think that’s true here though)

            • Lionir [he/him]OP
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              Yeah, either that or [any]. I don’t know why people would be offended.

              Also, did you mean enby? I just realised you said nimby (not in my back yard) which is not quite the same thing lol