• @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -96 months ago

    Sure. If voters showed up at the midterms and gave him a D house, he could have done more. But they didn’t.

    If Democrats had used the majorities we gave them during his first two years instead of getting in their own way, this would be a convincing argument.

    • @Eccitaze
      link
      fedilink
      86 months ago

      They did use them as best they could. They were hamstrung by a filibustering Senate, and two conservative Democrat senators (Sinema and Manchin) who refused to support getting rid of it, making killing the proposition of killing the filibuster DOA. As a result, their only choice to pass legislation was budget reconciliation, which aren’t subject to filibuster. The issue is that reconciliation has several big limits:

      1. The bill has to be related to government spending, revenue, and the debt ceiling. You can’t toss in things like minimum wage increases or voting rights legislation.

      2. You can only pass one of these bills per year (theoretically you can do more, but additional reconciliation bills have to go through the budgrt committee and with a 50/50 senate the GOP can just skip those meetings to deny quorum and keep it stuck)

      3. Whatever passes still has to get at least 50 votes, which means either appeasing Manchin/Sinema or getting Republican votes (which ain’t gonna happen)

      And despite that, we still got the CHIPS act, an infrastructure bill, and the Inflation Reduction Act, which–even with Manchinema throwing as many grenades in the process as they could get away with–was the biggest climate change bill in our country’s history. Not perfect, no, but a sizable step in the right direction, for once.

      • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -46 months ago

        They were hamstrung by a filibustering Senate, and two conservative Democrat senators

        That’s what I mean by getting in their own way.