I hope it’s better than Civ 6.

    • @djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      266 months ago

      I’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.

      • @Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Armies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.

    • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yep.

      5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral.

      4 is the best of what civlization has to offer.

      4 was also great in that it got two expansions

      instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.

    • mox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      I thought 5 was quite good with the Brave New World expansion/rework.

        • @silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Apparently I was thinking of ‘Conflicts in Civilization’, which was just a scenario set for the base Civ II game. Tbh I sucked hard at that game back then but in my defence I was too young to really get good strategy and just enjoyed building wonders