Count Regal Inkwell to [email protected] • 4 months agodeath of the ruleternetpawb.socialimagemessage-square106arrow-up11.13Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imagedeath of the ruleternetpawb.socialCount Regal Inkwell to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square106
minus-squareCount Regal InkwellOPlinkfedilink85•4 months ago“You shouldn’t do [y] either, you idiot, you absolute fucking buffoon. You should instead do [z, which costs a fortune and/or requires you to restructure your entire life]”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink56•4 months agoThread closed [x] already answered please go to link: completly unrelated topic actually about [a]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish33•4 months agoAnd the link points to a solution from 2006 using a method that’s been outdated and unsupported for a decade.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agosomebody replies to it “Here’s everything going wrong with [x]”
“You shouldn’t do [y] either, you idiot, you absolute fucking buffoon. You should instead do [z, which costs a fortune and/or requires you to restructure your entire life]”
Thread closed [x] already answered please go to link: completly unrelated topic actually about [a]
And the link points to a solution from 2006 using a method that’s been outdated and unsupported for a decade.
somebody replies to it “Here’s everything going wrong with [x]”
But it will be slighly more efficient