@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 5 months agoA little kid would have stood even less of a chance than the swanlemmy.worldimagemessage-square22arrow-up1654arrow-down111
arrow-up1643arrow-down1imageA little kid would have stood even less of a chance than the swanlemmy.world@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square22
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•5 months agoIs he saying a child wouldn’t have survived against the swan or that he himself could easily kill a child?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-25 months agoit’s 2024, let’s drop jpg already… Both thatsthejoke.exr and thatsthejoke.jpegxl can have several layers, as well as better punch thanks to higher bit depth
minus-squareanamelinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoI believe child would not have surviver offence nor defence
Is he saying a child wouldn’t have survived against the swan or that he himself could easily kill a child?
That’sTheJoke.jpg
it’s 2024, let’s drop jpg already… Both thatsthejoke.exr and thatsthejoke.jpegxl can have several layers, as well as better punch thanks to higher bit depth
yes
Whoosh
I believe child would not have surviver offence nor defence