• @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    They’ll never accept that, because they fundamentally see nothing wrong with the system. They want to preserve the broken machine, even if it doesn’t work for them. They think changing the oil will repair it, when it was designed to break.

    • @Eccitaze
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      More like we don’t want to crash our only car when we don’t have another means of transportation, and oops, now we can’t get to work.

      It’s great to say “the system is broken and must be replaced.” I agree! But nobody who says that, me included, has ever had anything resembling an actual plan to replace the system or to prevent something even worse from taking over once the system is destroyed.

      Everyone gave the GOP shit for screaming about how Obamacare needs to be “repealed and replaced” but never saying what it should be replaced with (though that was because the “replace” part was a lie and they just wanted to go back to the bad old days of people being trapped in a job or entirely unable to get insurance because of a preexisting condition). It’s the same thing with people saying the entire system of government needs to be replaced.

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        But nobody who says that, me included, has ever had anything resembling an actual plan to replace the system

        There are numerous other models of government being practiced all over the world. Choose one of them (I would recommend Swiss democracy).

        • @Eccitaze
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          It’s all well and good to say “choose another system of governance” but how do we implement this change? What is the mechanism under which we can replace our current system of government with Swiss democracy, without the old government just saying “lolno” and bombing it to shit? The only method I can think of is a constitutional convention, and right now we’re closer to the right wing being able to call one and rewrite it to take pur rights back 200 years than we are to leftists implementing Swiss democracy.

          Like… I would be thrilled if that were within the realm of possibility, but as it stands any possible options for dramatically overhauling our system of governance is more likely to lurch us straight into permanent hard-right minority rule by a bunch of fascists. That’s what I mean when I say I’ve never seen an actual plan by leftists to overhaul the system–it’s all arguing about what the sexy end goal should be, without bothering to talk about the boring minutiae of how to actually get to it. So far as I can tell, the “plan” to make all these needed changes, so far as any thought is put into it at all, is just a silent assumption of either “we lobby our politicians and they do what we tell them and nobody opposes our ideas” or “we do a violent revolution and kill all the bad guys without harming the good guys and we definitely win and accomplish our goal without someone else taking advantage of the chaos to do a fascism instead,” depending on how radical the change is.

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            how do we implement this change?

            Constitutional amendments

            without the old government just saying “lolno” and bombing it to shit?

            Make sure the old government doesn’t have enough votes.

            options for dramatically overhauling our system of governance is more likely to lurch us straight into permanent hard-right minority rule by a bunch of fascists.

            Agreed, but it doesn’t have to be like that.