Five to United [email protected]English • 4 months agoSainsbury's staff beat up shoplifter after dragging him into the back roommetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square53arrow-up1126arrow-down14
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkSainsbury's staff beat up shoplifter after dragging him into the back roommetro.co.ukFive to United [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square53
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-24 months agoIf you’re implying that there is some element here that justifies dragging the guy out back and beating him senseless after he was caught, by all means, elaborate
minus-squarestreetlightslinkfedilinkEnglish-9•4 months agoNope, I haven’t attempted to justify any of that. Not the point I was making.
minus-squareEcho DotlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-24 months agoThat’s your problem though. Nobody can tell what point you were trying to make because it was so incoherent, hence my original comment
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoI don’t think it’s that hard to understand the point they were making is “all theft is okay.” It’s just a stupid point.
minus-squarestreetlightslinkfedilinkEnglish-6•4 months agoYou got it perfectly All situations are nuanced you can’t just sign on with blanket philosophies, it doesn’t work.
If you’re implying that there is some element here that justifies dragging the guy out back and beating him senseless after he was caught, by all means, elaborate
Nope, I haven’t attempted to justify any of that. Not the point I was making.
That’s your problem though. Nobody can tell what point you were trying to make because it was so incoherent, hence my original comment
I don’t think it’s that hard to understand the point they were making is “all theft is okay.”
It’s just a stupid point.
He’s like 900 years old but whatever you say.
You got it perfectly
You’re an idiot.
No worries friend.