• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      756 months ago

      Based on his record, a few articles snd forum posts explaining what should happen, all of which will be ignored by the legal system, there won’t even be a baliff giving Mr. Trump a heavy slap, which seems apropriate with how Mr. Trump behaves.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        86 months ago

        He’s the embodiment of how broken the “justice” system is.

        Nothing broken about the (so-called) “justice” system. It’s working exactly as designed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          16 months ago

          Court costs for appeals should be based on the net worth of the appealing entity. Trump’s entire strategy for business, politics and personal relationships for his entire life has been “my daddy left me a pile of money, so I can afford to sue you until the end of time, or you can just cut your losses and walk away now”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Court costs for appeals should be based on the net worth of the appealing entity.

            In other words, you are proposing to actually break the (so-called) “justice system” so that it cannot work as designed.

            You do understand that the (so-called) “justice system” was designed to keep you under control while enabling the parasite class (of which Trump is a proud member) to essentially do whatever they feel like and has never existed for any other reason?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Ελληνικά
                  36 months ago

                  Because going all the way takes us back to caveman society.

                  No system is perfect, and no system is equal, and most importantly, people in a system will adapt to take advantage of the system. That’s why it’s useless to go “all the way”, the system is there to keep us from just clubbing each other over the head whenever we feel wronged. It’s much better that we have a dynamic and living system that can respond to loopholes and attempts to thwart it. Incremental change is the way the system should react.

                  It is a challenging question though. How do you afford the “little man” their right to appeal rulings, without giving the “big man” unlimited leeway to appeal and delay justice?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -16 months ago

                    Because going all the way takes us back to caveman society.

                    Where did you get this? At the local Fascist Fortune Cookie store? Hollywood, maybe?

                    Where is your evidence of this?

                    How do you afford the “little man” their right to appeal rulings, without giving the “big man” unlimited leeway to appeal and delay justice?

                    If you are unwilling to do away with the very systems that are designed to protect and enable the “big men” the answer is simple - you can’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Then slammed, and flattened again, and then kneaded, rolled, blasted, and risen. Then he’s gonna get SLICED.