• @derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    246 months ago

    Libertarians only care about 2 things: lowest taxes possible and legal weed, and they would gladly sacrifice the latter in favor of the former. Anything else is nothing more than lip service.

    Universal healthcare means taxes, and that is the one thing Libertarians hate above all. Never mind that it would be cheaper than private insurance. They relish in the fact they can skip buying insurance, and if they get hurt, ERs are required to treat them anyway.

    • Kalcifer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Libertarians only care about 2 things: lowest taxes possible and legal weed, and they would gladly sacrifice the latter in favor of the former. Anything else is nothing more than lip service.

      This is a very ignorant statement.

      • @derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Paying lip service is meaningless. I look at who self-professed libertarians actually vote for. That is the basis of my statement.

        • Kalcifer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          I look at who self-professed libertarians actually vote for.

          Personally, I see this as a very weak metric, if it is measured within a FPTP system. It is generally not within one’s best interest to vote for an entity that perfectly aligns with one’s interests under FPTP — one must often vote strategically.

          Libertarians only care about 2 things: lowest taxes possible and legal weed

          If you haven’t already, I strongly encourage you to, at the very least, read through the Wikipedia article on libertarianism.

          • @derf82@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            I have read it, and find it bullshit. Libertarians always manage to decide to “strategically” vote for the Republican that promises authoritarianism but also promises low taxes. Again, it’s not about what Libertarians say they support, it’s who they actually support.

            • Kalcifer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              I have read it, and find it bullshit.

              What exactly do you disagree with? It’s really just a definition. If you are encountering people who are advocating for authoritarianism while calling themselves libertarian, then they are misappropriating the term.

              Libertarians always manage to decide to “strategically” vote for the Republican that promises authoritarianism but also promises low taxes.

              This is very likely to be a faulty generalization. Also, there are policies on both the Democrat, and Republican side which can be construed as authoritarian.

              Again, it’s not about what Libertarians say they support, it’s who they actually support.

              I’d be very hesitant to call stategic voting “supporting”.

    • @barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      I think there are roughly three subgenres of libertarian; the two you identify (wants hierarchy with warlords and wants public heroin use without jail time) but then there is also a third group that has focused a lot of rage on age of consent laws for some reason.

    • @HANN@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -36 months ago

      Libertarian care about maximizing social and economic liberties. Liberty being defined as freedom from authority. Taxes are forced on citizens so libertarians generally want to limit taxes to a minimum. I see no reason to believe that universal healthcare would be cheaper than insurance. The government is an inefficient monopoly where private insurance companies have to compete for the lowest rates.

      • I see no reason to believe that universal healthcare would be cheaper than insurance.

        Private health insurance still has a “profit margin” that boards are legally bound to. The public system removes that line item.

        • @HANN@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          -26 months ago

          Profit margins are to keep a company out of debt and ensure it can grow as technology advances. Government would still need to pay employees and keep up with tech. But your right, government does need to avoid debt because it can just print money but that leads to inflation. There is no way to make cost just disappear.

      • @derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        You want to maximize liberty, but have a funny way of showing it. Libertarians vote for the most authoritarian they can, as long as they will cut taxes. Even if that means banning abortion, keeping marijuana prohibition, forcing religion on children in schools, supporting civil forfeiture, preventing people from choosing sustainable energy, and so much more.

        As has famously been said, taxes are the price we pay for civilized society. The non-aggression principle I believe is absolute bullshit. Libertarian would happily screw over anyone, claiming they are simply exercising their personal liberty. They couldn’t care any less about the well being of anyone else but themselves. Absolute barbarians if you ask me. Personally, I’m happy to get good services for my taxes, and not see my money go to a greedy asshole CEO. Sure, politicians are also greedy assholes, but at least the people can vote them out.

        It would cost less because a single entity, costing much less overhead. Also, a single entity would have far more buying power. Almost every doctor would have to accept them, eliminating out-of-network costs. And we wouldn’t have hundreds of overpaid executives that pat themselves on the back with multimillion dollar bonuses for denying sick people coverage. And we can see it in action. Most industrialized countries already have some form of universal healthcare, and they all cost less per capita. People that actually have universal healthcare generally love it. And don’t talk to me about waiting lists. I’ve been on plenty of waiting lists right here, and lots of people can’t even get on them because they can’t afford the care they need.

        Competition simply does not work in the healthcare market. When people are sick, they are limited typically to one option. And it has inelastic demand, so changing prices don’t change demand, and thus hospitals and doctors can charge whatever. The system, built on the economic principles libertarians espouse, is god-awful.

      • @eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        How is having numerous private companies all concerned with billing in any way efficient? Imagine if everyone was covered and the money and time and intelligence used to decide how much they pay and how much you pay went towards actual healthcare. The whole existence of health insurance is an inefficiency.