• ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 months ago

      And birthed impressionism as a result. These are tools, artists will adapt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -46 months ago

        And if they can’t compete with the soulless generic crap that ai spits out, they probably shouldn’t be artists

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          146 months ago

          Everyone should be an artist. It doesn’t have to be professionally but everyone should be creating something.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            If they’re not doing it for a living they don’t have to compete with anyone, least of all AI

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          It’s less of an issue with competing via comparisons of two, more an issue with never being seen in the first place as real works become grains of sand on beaches of generated content.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      Every gallery in the world did not rush out to exhibit every submitted photograph with no curation or quality filter when photography was invented

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        A physical gallery has limited wall space. A website does not. Ai art should just be tagged as such, so it can be filtered

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        If youre implying that every gallery in the world is rushing to exhibit every submitted ai picture with no curation or quality filter, name 5.