• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          Honestly my answer felt super canned, like someone had asked it before and reported the answer as bad, so that doesn’t surprise me

        • AFK BRB Chocolate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          I’m always interested in seeing examples like this where the LLM will get to a right answer after a series of questions (with no additional information) about its earlier wrong responses. I’d love to understand what’s going on in the software that allows the initial wrong answers but gets the eventually right one without an additional input.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            One hypothesis is that having more tokens to process lets it “think” longer. Chain of Thought prompting where you ask the LLM to explain its reasoning before giving an answer works similarly. Also, LLMs seem to be better at evaluating solutions than coming up with them, so there is a Tree of Thought technique, where the LLM is asked to generate multiple examples of a reasoning step then pick the “best” reasoning for each reasoning step.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Take the goat over
      Return empty-handed
      Take the cabbage over
      Return with the goat
      Take wolf over
      Return empty-handed
      Take other wolf over
      AROOOOO BROTHERS CRANK THEM HOGS